Holistic Framework and its Dimensions for Egalitarian Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility

Authors

  •   Veda Devanand Malagatti Assistant Professor, Chetan Business School, 100ft. Road, Srinagar, Unkal, Hubli - 580 031, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i4/112771

Keywords:

Accountability

, CSR, Governance, Holistic Attitude

A13

, C12, D64, M14, O34

Paper Submission Date

, January 20, 2016, Paper sent back for Revision, June 19, Paper Acceptance Date, September 15, 2016.

Abstract

The evaluation of a business should be based on its contributions both in economic terms as well as in social terms to the community. Nowadays, CSR has an effect not only in technological innovations, but indirectly in administration and marketing innovations too. There is an enormous need of immense spiritual and holistic approach based on endurance governance and performance in corporate social responsibility itself, otherwise it will lead to a crisis if there is no turnaround. The research was carried out with 100 companies, comprising of private and public sector companies. The interpretation has been graphed in three components - Satvik, Rajasik, and Tamasik, which is further measured in real terms of high and low level of CSR. The study found that those institutions or organizations which intend to ignore corporate social responsibility as a mere deed will find it difficult in sustaining for longer durations in this dynamic and competitive modern world. The hypotheses have been illustrated and tested proving that CSR is vital for an organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-01

How to Cite

Malagatti, V. D. (2017). Holistic Framework and its Dimensions for Egalitarian Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i4/112771

Issue

Section

Corporate Social Responsibility

References

Bhola, S. S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility : Proximity to human resource management. HRM Review, 10 (4), 25-31.

Dhevika, V.P.T. (2008, July). Companies may be asked to keep the account of the CSR work. Economic Challenge,10(40), 21-22.

Gherghina, S. C., Vintila, G., & Dobrescu, D. (2015). An empirical research on the relationship between corporate social responsibility ratings and U.S. listed companies' value. Journal of Economics Studies and Research, Vol. (2015). DOI: 10.5171/2015.260450

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations : Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (7), 1053 - 1081.

KPMG. (2005, June). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Retrieved from https://commdev.org/userfiles/files/1274_file_D2.pdf

Latasri, O.T.V., & Suriyamurti, S. (2008, July). Corporate social responsibility in India. Economic Challenger, 10 (40), 41-46.

Mital, K. M. (1989). Social responsibilities of business. Delhi: Chanakya Publications.

Sahoo, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: From philanthropy to responsibility. HRM Review, 12, 28-32.

Sandhu, H. S., & Kapoor, S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility initiatives : An analysis of voluntary corporate disclosure. South Asian Journal of Management, 17 ( 2), 47-77.

Sharma, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility : An elixir for business or a compulsive concept. HRM Review, 10 (3), 35- 40.

Taj, H. M. (2011). Social and environment issues – Corporate social responsibility, sustainable development: Performance measures and indicators. Journal of Accounting and Finances, 25 (2), 93 - 99.

Varela, C. F. D. (2011). Prevailing trust through corporate social responsibility in Spain : Demystifying misleading profit-maximizing paradigms in the context of the current global crisis. Retrieved from http://www.nebrija.com/nebrija-medios/pdf/articulo-christian-duarte.pdf