Integrating Social and Business Case Approaches to Implement Watershed Development Projects in India

Authors

  •   B. S. Kalra Principal Scientist, Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (I.A.R. I.), New Delhi-110 012
  •   Anil Kumar Mishra Principal Scientist, Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (I. A R.I.), New Delhi-110 012

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i5/59322

Keywords:

Rainfed Areas

, Tangible and Intangible Outcome, Governance, Socio-Business Model, Village Development Society, Institutional Innovations

H7

, O2, Q2

Paper Submission Date

, November 4, 2013, Paper sent back for Revision, December 27, Paper Acceptance Date, January 11, 2014.

Abstract

In India, the rainfed agricultural areas, not necessary the water deficient ones, offer untapped potential for enhanced food production and food security. However, the policies adopted for rainwater harvesting in these areas have not integrated the private interests of the watershed community with public investment, and the farmers, at most of the times, remain aloof of such efforts. Strong access to tangible and direct benefits from rainwater harvesting measures and the opportunities for the watershed communities to contribute to such efforts are the prime requirements of the watershed development programmes. A support system for remunerative agriculture based on business principles needs to be a part and parcel of such efforts. Looking at the socioeconomic profile of the farmers in the rainfed regions, there is a need to create enabling institutional arrangements for them to become a part of it for effective implementation of watershed development projects. An autonomous two-tier village development society has been suggested for active participation of the local community and effective implementations of the projects. A closed chain business model is suggested to develop local partnerships for value addition and other business activities. However, institutional innovations have to be a continuous process which need to be experimented with to evolve an efficient and functional institution at the grass root levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

How to Cite

Kalra, B. S., & Mishra, A. K. (2015). Integrating Social and Business Case Approaches to Implement Watershed Development Projects in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 7(5), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i5/59322

Issue

Section

Rural Management

References

Farrington, J., & Lobo C. (1997). Scaling up participatory watershed development in India: Lessons from Indo-German watershed development programme. Natural Resource Perspectives Discussion Paper 17, Oversees Development Institute, London.

Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorate, S. K. (2000). Impact of public expenditure on poverty in rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(40), 3581-3588.

Government of India (2007). Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

Jodha, N. S. (2002). Decline of rural commons: Role of population growth and public policies, in D. K. Marothia (Ed.) Institutionalizing common pool resources (pp. 33-52). New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

Kalra, B.S. & Mishra, A.K. (2006). Watershed development programmes in India and institutional imperatives. Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 18 (4), 649-668.

Kerr, J. M., Pangare, G. Lokur-Pangare, V., George, P. J., & Kolavalli, S. (1998). The role of watershed projects in developing India's rainfed agriculture. Report submitted to the Word Bank, IFPRI, Washington.

Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India. (1995). Guidelines for watershed development. New Delhi: Government of India.

Mitter, H. (2005). HARIYALI Planned investment in watershed development, in B. R. Sharma, J. S. Samra, C.A. Scott, & S. P. Wani (Eds.) Watershed management challenges improving productivity, resources and livelihood (pp. 298-306). Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.

Planning Commission. (2012). Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017): Faster, more inclusive and sustainable growth. Government of India. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/planrel/12thplan/pdf/vol_1.pdf

Pretty, J. & Hine, R. (2001). Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: A summary of new evidence. Final report from the SAFE-World Research Project UK: University of Essex Centre for Environment and Society.

Raju, K.V., Narayanamoorthy, A., Kumar,G., Amarnath, H. K. (2004). State of Indian farmer : A millennium study. Water Resources, Vol. 3., Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. New Delhi Academic Foundation.

Rao, N.H. (2006). A framework for implementing information and communication technologies in agricultural development in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (4), 491-518. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.02.002

Shah, A. (2001a). Water scarcity induced migration: How far watershed projects can help? Economic and Political Weekly, 36 (35), 3405-3410.

Shah, A. (2001b). Who benefits from participatory watershed development? Lessons from Gujarat, India. Gatekeeper Series Number 97. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.

World Bank. (1998). Reducing poverty in India: Options for more effective public services. Report no. 17881-IN. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, South Asia Region, The World Bank, Washington D.C.