Stitching the Threads of Handbags : An Insight into Customers’ Attitude Toward Counterfeit Handbag Purchase

Authors

  •   Jasmandeep Kaur Associate Professor, Department of Management, Ideal Institute of Management and Technology, Karkardooma Institutional Area, Delhi - 110 092
  •   Renu Yadav Assistant Professor (Visiting) (Corresponding Author), Department of Management, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IGDTUW), Kashmere Gate, Delhi - 110 006
  •   Dhanjay Yadav Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IGDTUW), Kashmere Gate, Delhi - 110 006

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i6/174490

Keywords:

counterfeit products ; novelty ; integrity ; status ; perceived risk ; customer attitude ; willingness to buy
JELClassification Codes : M30, M31, M37
Paper Submission Date : July 25, 2024 ; Paper sent back for Revision : March 20, 2025 ; Paper Acceptance Date : May 28, 2025 ;
Paper Published Online : June 15, 2025

Abstract

Purpose : To explore what motivated the customer to buy a counterfeit handbag and how the attitude of the customer led to a willingness to purchase counterfeit handbags.

Methodology : SPSS (24) was used to conduct the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). This was followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for further validation, and finally, path analysis was conducted using AMOS (20). Data was obtained from 582 respondents.

Findings : Four factors or statuses (Customers seeking novelty, customers seeking status, customers with a sense of integrity, and customers who perceived risks) were identified as influencing customers’ attitudes toward counterfeit handbags. This research offered insights into these factors by dividing the analysis into two parts. In the first part, factors influencing customers’ attitudes toward counterfeit products (positively or negatively) were analyzed. The next step tested whether that attitude led to a willingness to buy counterfeit handbags. It was found that only one factor, namely, “customers seeking novelty,” developed a constructive attitude toward counterfeit products. The other two – consumers seeking status, namely “with a sense of integrity,” and those who “perceived risks” in purchasing counterfeit goods developed a negative attitude toward the same. It was further found that formed attitudes, positive or negative, influenced customers’ willingness to buy counterfeit products.

Practical Implications : Genuine brand manufacturers of handbags must target customers who are status-conscious and law-abiding when making a purchase. This could be done by running a campaign against counterfeit products and making prospective customers aware of the harmful effects of such purchases on the economy and society. Since it was found that individuals seeking new ideas might end up purchasing counterfeit products, marketers needed to attract these customers through other functional and non-functional aspects. Organizations should monitor both offline and online marketplaces to stay competitive. As the study found that integrity seemed to be a significant influencing factor in attitude formation and willingness to purchase counterfeit handbags, this could be achieved through the legal route.

Originality : The current research is reliable, as it demonstrates a direct relationship between the factors underlying counterfeit purchases and customer attitude as well as the customer attitude and willingness to buy. However, no study has been carried out on counterfeit handbags.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Kaur, J., Yadav, R., & Yadav, D. (2025). Stitching the Threads of Handbags : An Insight into Customers’ Attitude Toward Counterfeit Handbag Purchase. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 18(6), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i6/174490

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Adapa, A., Nah, F., Hall, R. H., Siau, K., & Smith, S. N. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(5), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1357902

Akman, I., & Mishra, A. (2017). Factors influencing consumer intention in social commerce adoption. Information Technology & People, 30(2), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2016-0006

Arora, M., & Mohan, D. (2019, April 30). Why most Indians purchase counterfeits. Fortune India. https://www.fortuneindia.com/opinion/why-most-indians-purchase-counterfeits/103166

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207038801600107

Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Baumgartner, J. (1990). The level of effort required for behaviour as a moderator of the attitude–behaviour relation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200105

Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., & Schaepman, M. E. (2008). Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use & Management, 24(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x

Bhatia, V. (2018). Examining consumers' attitudes towards the purchase of counterfeit fashion products. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2017-0177

Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2009). An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.012

Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). Counterfeits and branded products: Effects of counterfeit ownership. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(5), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111157900

Bian, X., Wang, K.-Y., Smith, A., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). New insights into unethical counterfeit consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4249–4258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.038

Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(3), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6

Bupalan, K., Rahim, S. A., Ahmi, A., & Rahman, N. A. (2019). Consumers' repurchase intention towards counterfeit products. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 973–981. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335219509

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644

Cheung, W.-L., & Prendergast, G. (2006). Exploring the materialism and conformity motivations of Chinese pirated product buyers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v18n03_02

Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick Jr., R. L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7

de Matos, C. A., Ituassu, C. T., & Rossi, C. A. (2007). Consumer attitudes toward counterfeits: A review and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710720975

Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386

Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839

Eng, T.-Y., & Bogaert, J. (2010). Psychological and cultural insights into consumption of luxury Western brands in India. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 9(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539210X497620

Esin Akan. (2017, August 25). What makes handbags so appealing for women? https://www.esinakan.com/blogs/lifestyle/what-makes-handbags-so-appealing-for-women

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Hair Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelweiser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hidayat, A., & Diwasasri, A. H. (2013). Factors influencing attitudes and intention to purchase counterfeit luxury brands among Indonesian consumers. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(4), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v5n4p143

Jain, K., Gautam, S., & Pasricha, D. (2018). The pleasure and the guilt-impulse purchase and post-purchase regret: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121984

Jain, S., & Mishra, S. (2020). Luxury fashion consumption in sharing economy: A study of Indian millennials. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2019.1709097

Jiang, Y., Miao, M., Jalees, T., & Zaman, S. I. (2019). Analysis of the moral mechanism to purchase counterfeit luxury goods: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(3), 647–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2018-0190

Kar, B., Tripathy, A., & Pathak, M. D. (2021). What causes product returns in online purchases? A review and research agenda. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(4), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i4/162837

Kazi, R., Singh, A., & Sharma, A. (2018). The relationship between perceived ad morality and behavioral intentions: exploring the mediation effect: Indian women's perspective using structural equation modeling. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(3), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i3/122074

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2011). Marketing management (14th ed.). Pearson Education.

Krishnamurti, S., & Gupta, B. (2017). Changing consumer behavior paradigms: Does gender and marital status influence grocery shopping behavior? An exploratory study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i10/118693

Kwong, K. K., Yau, O. H., Lee, J. S., Sin, L. Y., & Tse, A. C. (2003). The effects of attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to buy pirated CDs: The case of Chinese consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026269003472

Liao, C.-H., & Hsieh, I.-Y. (2013). Determinants of consumer's willingness to purchase gray-market smartphones. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1358-7

Lopez-Nicolas, C., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management, 45(6), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.05.001

Malik, A., Merunka, D., Akram, M. S., Barnes, B. R., & Chen, A. (2020). Self-concept, individual characteristics, and counterfeit consumption: Evidence from an emerging market. Psychology & Marketing, 37(10), 1378–1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21386

Mallet, P., & Vignoli, E. (2007). Sensation seeking measures [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t11318-000

Maniatis, P. (2016). Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.067

Mathieson, M., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database: The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64

Michaelidou, N., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Antecedents of attitude and intention towards counterfeit symbolic and experiential products. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(9–10), 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.549189

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1867797

Panwar, S. (2021). Examining attitudes and non-price purchase determinants of counterfeit fashion products among consumers of Rajasthan (Doctoral dissertation, Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University). Shodhgangotri. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14146/8857

Pasricha, D., Jain, K., & Singh, G. (2020). Antecedents affecting the purchase intention of millennials towards luxury fashion goods: A mixed methods study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i1/149772

Petrick, J. F. (2002). An examination of golf vacationers' novelty. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00040-8

Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910927019

Phau, I., Prendergast, G., & Chuen, L. H. (2001). Profiling brand-piracy-prone consumers: An exploratory study in Hong Kong's clothing industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 5(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007278

Phau, I., Sequeira, M., & Dix, S. (2009a). Consumers' willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505930911000865

Phau, I., Sequeira, M., & Dix, S. (2009b). To buy or not to buy a “counterfeit” Ralph Lauren polo shirt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 1(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/17574320910942187

Pires, G., Stanton, J., & Eckford, A. (2004). Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.163

Quoquab, F., Pahlevan, S., Mohammad, J., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Factors affecting consumers' intention to purchase counterfeit products: An empirical study in the Malaysian market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(4), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0169

Ramayah, T., Ai Leen, J. P., & Wahid, N. B. (2002). Purchase preference and view: The case of counterfeit goods. In The Proceeding of the UBM conference (pp. 1–13).

Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W., & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007

Rathore, V. (2013, August 28). Luxury brands like Hermes, Gucci & others to take on faster-growing fakes in India. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/fashion-/-cosmetics-/-jewellery/luxury-brands-like-hermes-gucci-others-to-take-on-faster-growing-fakes-in-india/articleshow/22107281.cms?from=mdr

Rishi, B., & Mehra, A. K. (2017). Key determinants for purchasing pirated software among students. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2017.081504

Rosenberg, L., Turunen, L. L., Jarvela, S.-M., & Arnould, E. (2022). The handbag. Consumption Markets & Culture, 25(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2020.1756269

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Samaddar, K., & Menon, P. (2025). Non-deceptive counterfeit products: A morphological analysis of literature and future research agenda. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 33(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1772348

Schreiber, J. B. (2008). Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.04.003

Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Bolton, L. E. (2013). Judging the book by its cover? How consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0478

Sridhar, G., & Murthy, G. N. (2017). Influence of perceived risk and value consciousness on attitude towards music piracy. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i10/118694

Stavkova, J., Stejskal, L., & Toufarova, Z., (2008). Factors influencing consumer behaviour. Agricultural Economics, 54(6), 276-284. https://doi.org/10.17221/283-AGRICECON

Ting, M.-S., Goh, Y.-N., & Isa, S. M. (2016). Determining consumer purchase intentions toward counterfeit luxury goods in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21(4), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.07.003

van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000445

Verma, S., Kumar, R., & Yadav, S. K. (2018). Why do consumers buy counterfeit products? A case study of the Indian clothing industry. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(7), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i7/129738

Wang, F., Zhang, H., Zang, H., & Ouyang, M. (2005). Purchasing pirated software: An initial examination of Chinese consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(6), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510623939

Wee, C.-H., Ta, S.-J., & Cheok, K.-H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339510102949

Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? : An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001

Wu, Q., & Zhao, S. (2021). Determinants of consumers' willingness to buy counterfeit luxury products: An empirical test of linear and inverted U-shaped relationship. Sustainability, 13(3), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031194

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203