AI and ESG Performance : An Empirical Study of the High-Tech Sector

Authors

  •   Harsahib Singh Assistant Professor (Corresponding Author), Department of Strategy, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and CSR, Birla Institute of Management Technology (BIMTECH), Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida - 201 306, Uttar Pradesh
  •   Rashmi Aggarwal Professor, Department of Strategy Management, Entrepreneurship, and International Business, School of Management and Entrepreneurship, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, NH91, Tehsil Dadri, Greater Noida - 201 314, Uttar Pradesh
  •   Poonam Garg Professor, Department of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Management Technology, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR - 201 001
  •   Dalaisha Aggarwal Student, Hidayatullah National Law University, Sector 40, Uparwara, Atal Nagar-Nava Raipur - 492 002, Chhattisgarh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i6/174487

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, ESG, benefits, High-tech manufacturing, Strategic management
JELClassification Codes : M10, O31, O32, O33, Q01
Paper Submission Date : January 15, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 14, 2025 ; Paper Acceptance Date :May 25, 2025 ;
Paper Published Online : June 15, 2025

Abstract

Purpose : This study aimed to identify and prioritize the benefits of AI integration through such technologies as machine learning, natural language processing, and robotic process automation for improving environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in the high-tech sector.

Methodology : The items (benefits) were generated through a comprehensive literature review and qualitative interviews with industry practitioners involved in AI integration for ESG. Qualitative thematic analysis categorized the items into relevant themes. Subsequently, survey data were collected from 170 respondents, including business heads, managers, AI/ESG consultants, and specialists. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed to identify the factors representing AI’s benefits for ESG. Furthermore, Pareto analysis identified the factors that significantly impacted the ESG parameters due to AI integration.

Findings : EFA resulted in a six-factor structure representing the benefits of AI: proactive governance (PG), environmental preservation (EP), risk management (RM), data management (DM), operational optimization (OO), and stakeholder engagement (SE). Pareto analysis indicated that PG, EP, and RM represented the most impactful areas.

Practical Implications : The study offered empirical evidence for improving the high-tech sector’s ESG performance. It guided industry practitioners to leverage AI for better positioning in ever-evolving competitive markets strategically. The validated framework will enable decision-makers to focus their investments in areas with the highest impact.

Originality : This research empirically validated the benefits of linking artificial intelligence to sustainability performance in the high-tech sector, contributing to academic literature and practical implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Singh, H., Aggarwal, R., Garg, P., & Aggarwal, D. (2025). AI and ESG Performance : An Empirical Study of the High-Tech Sector. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 18(6), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i6/174487

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, Article ID 121423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783

Arora, A. K., & Rathi, P. (2019). Determinants for the adoption of digitalization by manufacturing SMEs in India: An empirical study. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(8), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i8/146410

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004

Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlström, P., Henke, N., & Trench, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier? McKinsey & Company.

Burnaev, E., Mironov, E., Shpilman, A., Mironenko, M., & Katalevsky, D. (2023). Practical AI cases for solving ESG challenges. Sustainability, 15(17), 12731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712731

Chen, L., Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Hua, J., Al-Fatesh, A., Ihara, I., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based solutions for climate change: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(5), 2525–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01617-y

Chen, P., & Hao, Y. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2324

Chen, R., & Zhang, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications implication for ESG performance: Can digital transformation of enterprises promote sustainable development? Chinese Management Studies, 19(3), 676–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-11-2023-0653

Chen, W., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Luan, X., & Song, Y. (2019). The impact of high-tech industry agglomeration on green economy efficiency—Evidence from the Yangtze River economic belt. Sustainability, 11(19), 5189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195189

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

de Villiers, C., Dimes, R., & Molinari, M. (2024). How will AI text generation and processing impact sustainability reporting? Critical analysis, a conceptual framework, and avenues for future research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2023-0097

Dixit, A., Jha, R., Baber, R., & Baber, P. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on digital employee engagement. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(9), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i9/173940

Dogru, A. K., & Keskin, B. B. (2020). AI in operations management: Applications, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-020-00023-1

Dwibedi, P., Pahi, D., & Mishra, A. P. (2025). Corporate environmental, social, and governance disclosure and performance dynamics: An empirical analysis of BRICS nations. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i2/174769

Ernst & Young. (2023). Artificial intelligence ESG stakes. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_ca/topics/ai/ey-artificial-intelligence-esg-stakes-discussion-paper.pdf

Evalueserve. (2023). Building the future: AI's foundational role in ESG data production and assessment. https://www.evalueserve.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Building_the_Future_AIs_Foundational_Role_in_ESG_Data_Production_and_Assessment_.pdf

Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? Economic Modelling, 118, Article ID 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101

Galaz, V., Centeno, M. A., Callahan, P. W., Causevic, A., Patterson, T., Brass, I., Farber, D., Fischer, J., Garcia, D., McPhearson, T., Jimenez, D., King, B., Larcey, P., & Levy, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability. Technology in Society, 67, Article ID 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101741

Gupta, K., Raman, T. V., Deol, O. S., & Gupta, K. (2022). Environment, social, and governance performance and firm risk: A study of the Indian consumer goods sector. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(8), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i8/171373

Hao, X., & Demir, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence in supply chain decision-making: An environmental, social, and governance triggering and technological inhibiting protocol. Journal of Modelling in Management, 19(2), 605–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2023-0009

Henisz, W., Koller, T., & Nuttall, R. (2019). Five ways that ESG creates value: Getting your environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposition right links to higher value creation. Here's why. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/five-ways-that-esg-creates-value

Jain, K. (2023). Taking AI adoption in high tech to the mainstream. Infosys. https://www.infosys.com/insights/ai-automation/high-tech-mainstream.html

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2009). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692

Lee, Y.-C., Dervishi, I., Mousa, S., Safiullin, K. I., Ruban-Lazareva, N. V., Kosov, M. E., Ponkratov, A. S., Mikhina, E. V., & Elyakova, I. D. (2023). Sustainable development adoption in the high-tech sector: A focus on ecosystem players and their influence. Sustainability, 15(18), 13674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813674

Li, S., Younas, M. W., Maqsood, U. S., & Zahid, R. M. (2024). Impact of AI adoption on ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Energy & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241269041

Lin, B., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Does AI elevate corporate ESG performance? A supply chain perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3999

Loureiro, S. M., Guerreiro, J., & Tussyadiah, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 129, 911–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.001

Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494

Meng, S., Su, H., & Yu, J. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate social performance: How do board independence and institutional ownership matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915583

Minimol, M. C., Akhila, K. V., & Kavya, N. P. (2025). Firm performance in India: Does sustainability reporting matter? Indian Journal of Finance, 19(3), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i3/174847

Mohapatra, A. K., Matta, R., Soni, R., & Hiremath, N. V. (2024). Evaluating the role of artificial intelligence on ESG reporting: Evidence from India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(11), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i11/174020

Nadeem, F., & Singh, A. (2024). ESG investing from the perspective of 4Ps of marketing. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(6), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i6/173561

Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, Article ID 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104

Pappas, I. O., Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Lekakos, G. (2018). Big data and business analytics ecosystems: Paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 16(3), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-018-0377-z

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Ren, S., & Mohd Isa, S. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24191/jibe.v8i1.23147

Sætra, H. S. (2023). The AI ESG protocol: Evaluating and disclosing the environment, social, and governance implications of artificial intelligence capabilities, assets, and activities. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2438

Sault, S. (2021). SDIS21: Tech for good - What are the challenges in making technology more sustainable? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/09/tech-for-good-what-are-the-challenges-in-making-technology-more-sustainable-sdgs-4g-5g-cybersecurity-data-privacy-e-waste/

Singh, S., Dutta, S., & Sharma, D. (2024). Mapping the landscape of sustainability reporting: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(11), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i11/174023

Sipola, J., Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2023). Adopting artificial intelligence in sustainable business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426, Article ID 139197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139197

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Trahan, R. T., & Jantz, B. (2023). What is ESG? Rethinking the “E” pillar. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4382–4391. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3371

Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E., & Bhatia, M. (2023). ESG performance and technological change: Current state-of-the-art, development and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 429, Article ID 139493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139493

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Nerini, F. F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), Article no. 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Wei, J., & Zheng, Q. (2024). Environmental, social and governance performance: Dynamic capabilities through digital transformation. Management Decision, 62(12), 4021–4049. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-2028

World Economic Forum. (2022). Defining the 'G' in ESG governance factors at the heart of sustainable business. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Defining_the_G_in_ESG_2022.pdf

Yang, P., Hao, X., Wang, L., Zhang, S., & Yang, L. (2024). Moving toward sustainable development: The influence of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance. Kybernetes, 53(2), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0521

Zhang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96(Part C), Article ID 103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103713