Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 1001

A Study of Awareness and Perception Regarding MOOC Courses with Special Reference to NPTEL

Affiliations

  • Associate Professor, KIET School of Management, KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad - 201 206, India
  • Associate Professor, Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310, India
  • Associate Professor (Corresponding Author), Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310, India
  • Assistant Professor, Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310, India

Abstract


Purpose : The study aimed to determine the level of awareness among students regarding NPTEL MOOCs and the reasons for registering or not registering for the courses. Further, this study explored the impact of gender and qualification on the category of aware respondents.

Methodology : The study was a cross-sectional study for which data were collected from the Delhi-NCR region from January to March 2023. The study was based on primary data, considering 379 responses that were collected with the help of a structured questionnaire. The chi-square test and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

Findings : The study found that receiving the certificate, being more convenient regarding timing and location, and having command over the subject were the perceived benefits of doing NPTEL courses. The main reasons for not finishing the course were time constraints, students’ poor course selection, and loss of momentum as the course progressed. Gender was found to be independent of the category of aware respondents, while qualification was not found to be independent.

Practical Implications : It was recommended that universities, colleges, and teachers adopt blended learning, which included e-learning as well as face-to-face learning, to help students score more. The NPTEL course providers and teachers should spread awareness regarding the courses, as 31% of the respondents were not aware of NPTEL. The study recommended that students be more careful while choosing the course and complete the course to earn the certificate, which can enhance their curriculum and, in turn, help them get a good job.

Originality : Unlike prior research on the utility of MOOCs, the current work examined the learner’s perception toward the NPTEL courses conducted by the premium institutions in India.


Keywords

MOOC, Online Learning, Distance Education, Distance Learning, NPTEL.

JEL Classification Codes : I20, I21, I23

Paper Submission Date : August 10, 2023 ; Paper sent back for Revision : March 10, 2024 ; Paper Acceptance Date : March 25, 2024 ; Paper Published Online : April 15, 2024


Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 1)

References


  • Allen, I. E., Seaman J., Poulin R., & Straut T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Thirteenth Annual Report by Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572777.pdf

  • Alqurashi, E. (2018). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning in online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

  • Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching-learning process: A study of higher education teachers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825

  • Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perception of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.pdf

  • Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students' perspectives: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0027

  • Chung, L. Y. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of self-regulated learning in massive open online courses for non-native english speakers. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 13(3), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2015070105

  • Gamage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of MOOCs using empirical tools: Learners perspective. 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 8276–8284. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.0937

  • Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

  • Gill, S., Sharma, A., & Jain, D. M. (2023). Digital disruptions in education: Students' perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(9), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i9/173167

  • Goh, L. H. (2016). The effectiveness and challenges of MOOC for learning. In, Third Asia-Pacific Conference on Advanced Research (APCAR, Melbourne, July 2016), 275–287. https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/16_APCAR_July_BRR771_EDU-275-287.pdf

  • Kumar, S., Janardhanan, A. K., Khanna, S., William, R. M., & Saha, S. (2023). Students' satisfaction with remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights for policymakers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(9), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i9/173166

  • Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning, and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programmes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

  • Lone, A. Z. (2017). Impact of online education in India. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 7(7), 13050–13952.

  • Othman, M. S., Tashimaimaiti, G., Yusuf, L. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2018). End-user perspectives on the effectiveness of learning performance through massive open online courses (MOOCs). In, F. Saeed, N. Gazem, S. Patnaik, A. Saed Balaid, & F. Mohammed (eds), Recent trends in information and communication technology. IRICT 2017. Lecture notes on data engineering and communication technologies (Vol 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_72

  • Patidar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2018). Perception of male and female students towards need of open courseware in institutions of higher learning and its associated factors: A comparative study. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(4), 102–106. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_20542146.pdf

  • Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

  • Prasad, P. D., Sunitha, K. V., & Rani, B. P. (2019). Factors affecting students continued intention to use MOOCs, benefits and drawbacks: A research paper from the UAE context. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(6S4), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.F1154.0486S419

  • Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students' engagement and their academic performances in an e-Learning environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019882567

  • Saadatdoost, R., Jafarkarimi, H., Hiang Sim, A. T., & Hee, J. M. (2019). Understanding MOOC learners: Insights from participation in Coursera MOOC. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 14(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2019010107

  • Shokeen, A., Kumar, A., & Khanna, S. (2023). Understanding students' behavioral intention to adopt blended learning: Modified UTAUT model. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(11), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i11/170915

  • Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practises in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001

  • Ventista, O. M. (2018). Self-assessment in massive open online courses. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018784950

  • Weiand, A., Manssour, I. H., & Silveira, M. S. (2019). Visual analysis for monitoring students in distance courses. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(2), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019040102

  • Wong, B. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0023

  • Zaneldin, E., Ahmed, W., & El-Ariss, B. (2019). Video-based e-learning for an undergraduate engineering course. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(6), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019870938

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs – An explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share