Blockchain in the Lens of Populism : A Short Communication of Research Evidence

Authors

  •   Aarti Mehta Sharma Director and Associate Professor (Corresponding Author), Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Bengaluru Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 100, Karnataka
  •   Madhvi Sethi Director and Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Bengaluru Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 100, Karnataka
  •   A. Vidyasagar Deputy Director and Professor of Practice, Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Bengaluru Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 100, Karnataka
  •   Sabari Shankar Ravichandran Assistant Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Bengaluru Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Electronic City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 100, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i2/173329

Keywords:

Blockchain

, Populism, Technology, Medium and Small-Scale Organizations, Data Efficiency, Profit Maximization.

Paper Submission Date

, August 24, 2023, Paper sent back for Revision, February 5, 2024, Paper Acceptance Date, February 10, Paper Published Online, February 15, 2024

Abstract

Purpose : Blockchains are a sophisticated and extensively utilized technology that facilitates bulk data management operations and increases productivity for many companies, including governments. However, because of the high prices and complexity, not all large firms could take advantage of this disruptive weapon, which leads to populist ideas. The purpose of this brief message was to examine the new, popular ideas in blockchain technology that improve the global productive efficiencies of businesses.

Methodology : The two-stage method that produced the insights in this communication was followed by a sentiment analysis, network map, theme map, and latent Dirichlet allocation.

Findings : Blockchain technology has been widely adopted by the majority of the major services businesses. The industries that are currently scaling up, however, lack the viability to use this technology. The results also showed that neither academic research nor the corporate framework had examined the new populism situation.

Practical Implications : The productive efficiency of industries would be improved if governments and policymakers used populistic settings in blockchain technology. Additionally, eliminating the cost-based inequalities would inspire populist ideas throughout all industries, generating combined revenues.

Originality/Value : This brief message implied negative opinions about blockchain technology and was taken from a significant study on the impact of this technology on business success. This message is meant to benefit not only corporations but also governments and policymakers in facilitating regular access to technology for expanding industries that could strengthen economies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-02-01

How to Cite

Sharma, A. M., Sethi, M., Vidyasagar, A., & Ravichandran, S. S. (2024). Blockchain in the Lens of Populism : A Short Communication of Research Evidence. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i2/173329

References

Ali, M. A., & Bhaya, W. S. (2020, December). Blockchain technology's applications and challenges: An overview. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2290, No. 1, p. 040019). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0027424

Baharmand, H., Maghsoudi, A., & Coppi, G. (2021). Exploring the application of blockchain to humanitarian supply chains: Insights from Humanitarian Supply Blockchain pilot project. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(9), 1522–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2020-0884

Chen, L., Fu, Q., Mu, Y., Zeng, L., Rezaeibagha, F., & Hwang, M.-S. (2022). Blockchain-based random auditor committee for integrity verification. Future Generation Computer Systems, 131, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.01.019

Fusco, A., Dicuonzo, G., Dell'Atti, V., & Tatullo, M. (2020). Blockchain in healthcare: Insights on COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197167

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Suman, R. (2021). Blockchain technology applications for Industry 4.0: A literature-based review. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2(4), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100027

Kim, B., & Yoon, Y. (2018). Journalism model based on blockchain with sharing space. Symmetry, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11010019

Kumar, P., Kaur, H., & Singh, G. (2023). MSMEs in emerging markets: An exploration of the stage model of e-commerce adoption. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(8), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i8/173062

Luu, L., Narayanan, V., Zheng, C., Baweja, K., Gilbert, S., & Saxena, P. (2016, October). A secure sharding protocol for open blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 17–30). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978389

Manski, S. (2017). Building the blockchain world: Technological commonwealth or just more of the same? Strategic Change, 26(5), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2151

Mishra, R., Sharma, M. P., Seth, K., & Singh, V. (2023). A study on consumers' travel purchase intention through travel apps. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(7), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i7/172926

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Pournaras, E. (2020). Proof of witness presence: Blockchain consensus for augmented democracy in smart cities. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 145, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.06.015

Priya, J., & Palanisamy, C. (2023). Novel block chain technique for data privacy and access anonymity in smart healthcare. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 35(1), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.025719

Ravichandran, S. S., Koshy, E. R., & Mathew, S. K. (2023). Sustainability integration in wine destination branding: A comprehensive review perspective fostering UN Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(12), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i12/173247

Sardana, V., Mohapatra, A. K., Singhania, S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2024). Changing dynamics of banking landscape: What do we know and what lies ahead? Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i1/173288

Singh, S. P., Sajnani, M., & Arora, G. K. (2023). Tourism industry and circular economy: Deep interlinkages. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(5), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i5/172822

Sotoudehnia, M. (2021). 'Making blockchain real': Regulatory discourses of blockchains as a smart, civic service. Regional Studies, 55(12), 1857–1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1882671

Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664

Xu, R., & Guan, E. (2023). Can blockchain innovation promote total factor productivity? Evidence from Chinese-listed firms. Applied Economics, 55(6), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2093830

Xu, X., & He, Y. (2022). Blockchain application in modern logistics information sharing: A review and case study analysis. Production Planning & Control, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2058997