Analyzing the Gender Gap in Patents : A Lesson from Startups

Authors

  •   Shalini Sitaraman Goa Business School, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa - 403 206
  •   Nilesh Borde Goa Business School, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa - 403 206
  •   Purva Hegde Desai Goa Business School, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa - 403 206

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i9/172192

Keywords:

Law

, Legal Economic, Intellectual Property Law, Patent Law, Innovation, Research.

JEL Classification Codes

, K00, O3, O34, O31

Paper Submission Date

, June 30, 2021, Paper sent back for Revision, March 23, 2022, Paper Acceptance Date, May 20, Paper Published Online, September 15, 2022

Abstract

A study by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) indicated a disparity in the ratio of men to women IP rights holders. The Indian Patents Act, 1970, vide its amendment in September 2019, allowed women applicants to seek expedited examination of their patent applications, leading to shorter timelines in obtaining a patent. This study attempted to forecast the impact of the new legislation on women applicants by drawing an equivalence of the effects of similar legislation on startups. We tried to study whether the nature or gender of an applicant influenced the time taken for the grant of a patent; if gender mediated between the nature of the applicant and the time taken for the grant of a patent. Lastly, the study evaluated the amendment's impact on the time taken to grant a patent for women inventors. Research showed that since an equivalence could be drawn between women and startups as applicants, the growth in the number of female applicants and the number of patents awarded to female applicants will be similar to the effect of the 2016 amendment to the Patents Act on startups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

Sitaraman, S., Borde, N., & Desai, P. H. (2022). Analyzing the Gender Gap in Patents : A Lesson from Startups. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(9), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i9/172192

Issue

Volume 15, Issue 9, September 2022

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Adhana, D. (2016). Start-up India, Stand-up India: India turning into a startup hub by prospering entrepreneurial culture. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702510

Baptist, J. (2017). Introduction to "Women in Academia." Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 29(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2017.1272337

Ding, W. W., Murray, F. E., & Stuart, T. E. (2006). Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1260388

Drivas, K., Economidou, C., Karamanis, D., & Zank, A. (2016). Academic patents and technology transfer. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 45–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.04.001

Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705046630

Hoisl, K., & Mariani, M. (2017). It's a man's job: Income and the gender gap in industrial research. Management Science, 63(3), 766 –790. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2357

Hunt, J., Garant, J.-P., Herman, H., & Munroe, D. J. (2013). Why are women underrepresented amongst patentees? Research Policy, 42(4), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.004

Inamdar, S. C., & Nagendra, A. (2017). A study on the relationship between presence of women in boards and corporate reputation. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119978

Jung, T., & Ejermo, O. (2014). Demographic patterns and trends in patenting: Gender, age, and education of inventors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.023

Kumar, N., Kumar, P., & Nigam, D. (2021). A study of interaction effect of financial performance on the relationship of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(8), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i8/165676

Mathivannan, S., & Selvakumar, M. (2009). The management of small-scale industries by women entrepreneurs - A study with reference to Virudhunagar District. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 2(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2009/v2i2/60883

Palaniappan, A., & Aniyan, A. C. (2010). Empowering women through education, health and employment. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 3(11), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2010/v3i11/61172

Singh, P. (2013). Socialization and nurturing entrepreneurship among Indian women. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 6(10), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2013/v6i10/60036

Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., West, J. D., & Larivière, V. (2015). The academic advantage: Gender disparities in patenting. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0128000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128000

Suriyamurthi, S., Sheela, S. C., & Uma Rani, T. S. (2009). Globalization - Challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 2(3), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2009/v2i3/60929