Job Uncertainty After Ph.D.: A Common Concern for Doctoral Students of Technical Institutes of North East India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i8/146411Keywords:
Attrition
, Doctoral Students, Higher Education, Satisfaction, Student-Guide Relation.JEL Classification
, I20, I21, I23, I29.Paper Submission Date
, August 14, 2018, Paper Sent Back for Revision, July 6, 2019, Paper Acceptance Date, July 12, 2019.Abstract
A doctoral degree is the highest level of academic degree awarded by an academic institute. The doctoral program not only prepares the workforce to become faculties, administrators, and researchers in an academic institute, but also prepares the workforce for industry and business organizations. These workforces play a very important role in developing innovation that drives the economic growth of a nation. Attrition of doctoral students potentially wastes resources and time of both faculties and students which could otherwise be utilized elsewhere. High attrition reduces research output, which is an important factor while evaluating the status of an institution. Limited numbers of studies have been done on doctoral students' satisfaction and attrition in India. The present study was an attempt to explore the experience of doctoral students and also to find the factors influencing satisfaction of doctoral students studying in technical institutes of North East India. An offline survey was conducted with 300 doctoral students studying Engineering, Science, Mathematics, and Humanities & Management. Data collected were analyzed using factor analysis and hierarchical multiple regression. Supervisor/Guide and Department Support, Reason for Doing Ph.D., Stress and Lack of Motivation, and Insecurity were found to contribute 41% to doctoral students' satisfaction with a p-value of 0.039. The doctoral students studying in different departments had a common fear of not getting a matching job after Ph.D.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Angelo, T.A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment, techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2005). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 19, pp. 481-534). Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2456-8_11
Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
Cabral †Cardoso, C. J. (2001). Too academic to get a proper job? The difficult transition of PhDs to the “real world†of industry. Career Development International, 6(4), 212-217. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620430110397505
Choudhury, D. K. (2016). Sustainable research culture for enhancing the quality of deliverables in classroom teaching-learning environment : An in-depth analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(9), 27-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i9/101505
Doğan, N., & Bıkmaz, Ö. (2015). Expectation of students from their thesis supervisor. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3730-3737. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1106
Endo, J. J., & Harpel, R. L. (1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 115-138.
Flores-Scott, E. M., & Nerad, M. (2012). Peers in doctoral education: Unrecognized learning partners: Peers in doctoral education. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, 73-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/he.20007
Lovitts, B. E. (1996). Who is responsible for graduate student attrition-The individual or the institution? Toward an explanation of the high and persistent rate of attrition (ED399878). Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York, April 9,1996, Washington, DC: ERIC.
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, Md : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Mainhard, T., Rijst, V. D. R., Van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor-Doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58(7), 359-373.
McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006).Reframing our approach to Doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 3-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453012
Mohanty, B. K. (2015, November 18). Job lure beats research at IIT. The Telegraph India. Retrieved from https://www.telegraphindia.com/1151119/jsp/nation/story_53879.jsp
Nema, G., & Kasliwal, K. (2018). The impact of integrated marketing communication (IMC) tools on learning in B-schools: A study. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(5), 42-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i5/123813
Pushkar. (2015, December 13). Should India’s elite universities be partial to foreign PhDs in faculty hires ? The Wire. Retrieved from https://thewire.in/education/should-indias-elite-universities-be-partial-to-foreign-phds-in-faculty-hires
Ramanathan, V. (2018). Internalization of higher education in India: Existing realities and future outlook. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(6), 40-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i6/128441
Rout, B., & Ramdas, R. (2015). Determinants of students' dropout in Indian higher education. In, Democracy, governance and tribes in the age of globalized India – Reality & rhetoric (pp.77-90). New Delhi: Gyan Publishing.
Sharma, K. (2017, February 4). India spends only 0.85% of GDP on research studies. DNA India. Retrieved from http://www.dnaindia.com/academy/report-india-spends-only-085-of-gdp-on-research-studies-2311500
Singh, A., Singh, S., & Singh, K. (2014). Engineering education and entrepreneurial attitudes among students: Ascertaining the efficacy of the Indian educational system. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 7(6), 7-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i6/59323
