Productivity and Efficiency of Cashew Processing: Comparison of Manual and Automated Systems

Authors

  •   Ramakrishna Pai PG Student, Manipal Institute of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka
  •   Pallavi Upadhyaya Professor, Manipal Institute of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka
  •   Y. S. Upadhyaya Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i6/144933

Keywords:

Productivity

, Process Efficiency, SMEs, Cashew Processing, Automation.

JEL Classification

, D24, L66, M11, O14.

Paper Submission Date

, July 25, 2018, Paper Revision Date, May 22, 2019, Paper Acceptance Date, May 25, 2019.

Abstract

India is one of the leading producers, processors, and exporters of cashews in the world. Cashew processing units are primarily small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and are highly labor intensive. Productivity and efficiency of processing is a primary concern for cashew processing firms that operate with limited resources. Using a multiple-case study approach, this study compared the productivity and efficiency of automated cashew processing with the manual processing. Employees' perception towards automation was also examined. A comparative analysis was performed for the five stages of cashew processing : Sorting, shelling, peeling, grading, and packaging. Purposive sampling method was used to select five SMEs that used either manual or automated processing methods. The study identified the processing method that was the most efficient at each stage, taking into account both quantitative and qualitative data. It was found that automation of the cashew processing increased productivity by at least 10 times. It was also found that almost all the five stages required manual intervention as automation cannot completely replace humans. Due to high health hazards and fatigue, workers favored use of automated processing over manual processing. Health risk was high in the shelling and peeling stages of cashew processing. Fatigue due to repetitive work was high in sorting, grading, and peeling stages. Managerial implications for SME owners who plan to deploy automation technologies in their firms were also discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Pai, R., Upadhyaya, P., & Upadhyaya, Y. S. (2019). Productivity and Efficiency of Cashew Processing: Comparison of Manual and Automated Systems. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(6), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i6/144933

Issue

Section

Technology and Operations Management

References

Bhatt, N. (2016). Modelling of the factors influencing the implementation of advance manufacturing technologies in MSME. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 8(3), 12-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2016/15652

Cashew Export Promotion Council of India. (CEPCI). (2019). Statistics. Retrieved from http://cashewindia.org/statistics

Fagbemi, T. N. (2008). The influence of processing techniques on the energy, ash properties and elemental composition of cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale Linn). Nutrition & Food Science, 38(2), 136-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00346650810863019

Groover, M. P. (2005). Automation, production systems and computer-integrated manufacturing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Gunasekara, C. (2011). Technology mediation programs and SME innovative activities. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 4(11), 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2011/v4i11/62644

Khan, A., & Nasser, K. (2016). Advanced manufacturing technologies for smart and competitive businesses. The IUP Journal of Operations Management, 15(3), 7-17.

Kumar, P. V. V., Susmitha, T., Yamuna, P., & Yamini, B. (2016). Competitive challenge of cashew industry in Andhra Pradesh (with reference to Prakasam, East & West Godavari Districts). International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 7(11), 85-87. Retrieved from https://ijrcm.org.in/article_info.php?article_id=7136

Mishev, G. (2006). Analysis of the automation and the human worker, connection between the levels of automation and different automation concepts. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Jönköping School of Engineering, Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:228706/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Misztal, A., Butlewski, M., Jasiak, A., &, Janik, S. (2015). The human role in a progressive trend of foundry automation. Metalurgija, 54(2), 429-432. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/25564877.pdf

Mrugalska, B., Wyrwicka, M., & Zasada, B. (2016). Human-automation manufacturing industry system: Current trends and practice. In, F. Rebelo & M. Soares (eds.), Advances in ergonomics in design, advances in intelligent systems and computing (485, pp. 137-145). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_13

Nair, A., Ataseven, C., & Swamidass, P.M. (2013). An examination of the use of manufacturing technologies and performance implications in US plants with different export intensities. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3283-3299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.765069

Namdeo, N.A., Koulagi, K., & Wader, L. K. (2007). Grade development and study of price-quality relationship of cashew nut in north district of Goa. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 20, 171-176. Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/47434

Ojolo, S.J., Damisa, O., Orisaleye, J.I., & Ogbonnaya, C. (2010). Design and development of cashew nut shelling machine. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 8(2), 146-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17260531011062528

Percival, J. C., & Cozzarin, B. P. (2010). Complementarities in the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 21(2), 122-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2010.05.002

Sohal, A.S., Burcher, P.G., Millen, R., & Lee, G. (1999). Comparing American and British practices in AMT adoption. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 6(4) 310-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635779910297415

Teng, H.S.S. (2014). Qualitative productivity analysis: Does a non-financial measurement model exist ? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 250-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0034

Wu, B. (2012). Manufacturing systems design and analysis, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3128-5