Transformational Leadership and Workplace Spirituality: A Structural Model of Team Effectiveness

Authors

  •   K. P. Nandana Prabhu Associate Professor, School of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
  •   Lewlyn L. R. Rodrigues Professor and Head, Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
  •   Yogesh Pai Associate Professor, School of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i4/143344

Keywords:

Transformational Leadership

, Workplace Spirituality, Team Interaction Process, Team Effectiveness

M12

, M14, M19, M54, Z12

Paper Submission Date

, July 30, 2018, Paper sent back for Revision, March 20, 2019, Paper Acceptance Date, March 26, 2019

Abstract

The purpose of this research endeavor was to evaluate the effects of team transformational leadership and workplace spirituality on team effectiveness. This research sought to determine the impact of team culture, embedded in team transformational leadership, on team effectiveness. Further, it evaluated the comparative effects of the constructs of team interaction process and workplace spirituality on creation of process effects that lead to team effectiveness. This study adopted the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to test the hypotheses relating to the relationship among the exogenous constructs such as team transformational leadership, team interaction process, and workplace spirituality with the endogenous construct, that is, team effectiveness. This research investigated the relationship among these constructs on a sample of 130 teams of IT organizations. Situating team transformational leadership as a cultural construct in the team effectiveness research discourse ; the importance of internalized intrinsic motivation resulting from workplace spirituality in influencing team effectiveness ; empirical validation of the status of transformational leadership as a precursor to workplace spirituality ; the need to combine 'outside-in' and 'inside-out' approaches to team processes so as to increase the degree of team effectiveness ; performance - determining influence of team processes that outshines the performance-determining impact of transformational leadership were the specific contributions of this study to team effectiveness research. The need to cultivate team culture embedded in transformational leadership behaviors, team - level necessity to pay attention to the 'spiritual' side of team members, situating team leadership behaviors vis-à-vis member interaction behaviors in the context of team effectiveness were the managerial implications of this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

Nandana Prabhu, K. P., Rodrigues, L. L. R., & Pai, Y. (2019). Transformational Leadership and Workplace Spirituality: A Structural Model of Team Effectiveness. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i4/143344

Issue

Section

Spiritual Management

References

Ambrose, S. C., Matthews, L. M., & Rutherford, B. N. (2018). Cross-functional teams and social identity theory: A study of sales and operations planning (S&OP). Journal of Business Research, 92, 270-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.052

Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M., (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire : Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA : Mindgarden.

Balakrishnan, A. D., Kiesler, S., Cummings, J. N., & Zadeh, R. (2011, March). Research team integration: What it is and why it matters. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 523-532). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958905

Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In, K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA, US : Jossey-Bass.

Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams : An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159921

Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito et al. (eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690). Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155-159. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 414-436. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joop.12057

Daspit, J., Ramachandran, I., & D'Souza, D. (2014). TMT shared leadership and firm performance: Investigating the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Managerial Issues, 26(3), 219-239. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44113638

Euwema, M. C., Wendt, H., & van Emmerik, H. (2007). Leadership styles and group organizational citizenship behavior across cultures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1035-1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.496

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error : Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150980

Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams : Setting the stage for great performances. Boston : Harvard Business Publishing.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.

Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (eds.), Quantitative methods in education and the behavioral sciences : Issues, research, and teaching. Structural equation modeling : A second course (pp. 219-266). Charlotte, NC, US: IAP Information Age Publishing.

Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2011). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS, multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. London : Routledge.

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

Kinjerski, V. M., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2004). Defining spirit at work: Finding common ground. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410511288

Kinjerski, V., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2006). Measuring the intangible: Development of the spirit at work scale. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, A1-A6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.22898605

Kozlowski, S. W., & Chao, G. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena : Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73(4), 576-592. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245

Kumar, R. (2012). Nishkam Karma : The path for corporate social responsibility. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 5(2), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2012/v5i2/60128

Lvina, E., Johns, G., & Vandenberghe, C. (2018). Team political skill composition as a determinant of team cohesiveness and performance. Journal of Management, 44 (3), 1001-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206315598371 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206315598371

Mat Roni, S. (2014). Introduction to SPSS. School of Business, Edith Cowan University, Australia. Retrieved [2016.10. 14] from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262151892_Introduction_to_SPSS

McKee, M.C., Driscoll, C., Kelloway, E.K., & Kelley, E. (2011). Exploring linkages among transformational leadership, workplace spirituality and well-being in health care workers. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 8 (3), 233-255. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2011.599147

NASSCOM. (2017). The IT-BPM industry in India 2017: Strategic Review. Retrieved from https://www.nasscom.in/knowledge-center/publications/it-bpm-industry-india-2017-strategic-review

O'Neill, T. A., & McLarnon, M. J. (2018). Optimizing team conflict dynamics for high performance teamwork. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002

Pattanaik, A., Modi, S., & Budhiraja, S. (2015). Personal values as predictor of ethical behavior of managers: A study of select Indian public sector undertakings. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 8(10), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2015/v8i10/79816

Pawar, B. S. (2009). Workplace spirituality facilitation: A comprehensive model. Journal of Business Ethics, 90 (3), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685814539407

Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553

Prabhu, K. P. N., Rodrigues L. L. R., Kumar, R. K., & Pai, Y. P. (2019). Role of team transformational leadership and workplace spirituality in facilitating team viability: An optimal distinctiveness of identities' theory-based perspective. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(2), 64-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-07-2018-0062

Prabhu, K. P. N., Rodrigues, L. L. R., & Ramana Kumar, K. P. V. (2016). Workplace spirituality and team spirit at work: A team-level contextualization of spirituality. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9 (12), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i12/107006

Ramaprasad, B. S., Prabhu, K. P. N., Lakshminarayanan, S., & Pai, Y. P. (2017). Human resource management practices and organizational commitment : A comprehensive review (2001-2016). Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10 (10), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i10/118810

Scott, C. P., Jiang, H., Wildman, J. L., & Griffith, R. (2018). The impact of implicit collective leadership theories on the emergence and effectiveness of leadership networks in teams. Human Resource Management Review, 28 (4), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.005

Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 (1), 118-135. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5

Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4 (4), 577-594. doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577

Sheep, M. L. (2006). Nurturing the whole person : The ethics of workplace spirituality in a society of organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 66 (4), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0014-5

Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 66-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001005

Tanghe, J., Wisse, B., & Van Der Flier, H. (2010). The formation of group affect and team effectiveness: The moderating role of identification. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00656.x

Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. (2005). Team diagnostic survey : Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305281984

Wilkin, C. L., de Jong, J. P., & Rubino, C. (2018). Teaming up with temps: The impact of temporary workers on team social networks and effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(2), 204-218. 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1418329