Accreditation Compulsion or Inducement : A Perception Study of Various Stakeholders

Authors

  •   Teena Bagga Professor, Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977

Keywords:

Quality

, Academic Quality, AACSB, AMBA, EQUIS, IACBE, NBA, NAAC, Higher Education, Accreditation

I20

, I23, L15

Paper Submission Date

, April 14, 2017, Paper sent back for Revision, November 20, Paper Acceptance Date, November 25, 2017.

Abstract

This century has seen tremendous changes in higher-education institutions across the globe. The Indian education system too is witnessing a change in terms of privatization of education. Till the 1980s, the government was heavily funding these institutions because the focus then was to support the increasing demand of higher education. However, the mushrooming of private HEIs in India led the Govt. to stop the financial aid beyond the 1980s. A new National Policy on Education was drafted in 1986, and accordingly, many acts of the Parliament were passed in the following years to enforce quality assurance in higher education. Among the measures identified to ensure assurance of higher educational quality, accreditation was one. However, even after years of its existence through national accreditation agencies like NBA and NAAC since 1994, a majority of the HEIs still continue to exist and operate without an accreditation, along with a general understanding that there is a low level of awareness or understanding among the various stakeholders of higher education about the concept of 'accreditation'. The current research thus focused on ascertaining the actual figures and insights about the awareness of accreditation as well as the various perceptions which these different stakeholders held about accreditation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

Bagga, T. (2017). Accreditation Compulsion or Inducement : A Perception Study of Various Stakeholders. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977

Issue

Section

Education Management

References

Andrews, B.K., Roller, R.A., & Bovee, S.L. (2003). Specialized accreditation of business schools: A comparison of alternative costs, benefits, and motivations. Journal of Education for Business, 78 (4), 197 - 204.

Bagga, T., Bansal, S., Kumar, P., & Jain, S. (2016). New wave of accreditation in Indian higher education: Comparison of accreditation bodies for management programmes. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(8), 26 - 40. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i8/99778

Ball, C., & Urwin, D. (1985). Fitness for purpose: Essays in higher education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education & NFER-Nelson.

Barnett, R. (1994). Power, enlightenment and quality evaluation. European Journal of Education, 29 (2), 165 - 179.

Friend - Pereira, J. C., Lutz, K., & Heerens, N. (2002). European student handbook on quality assurance in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.esib.org/projects/qap/QAhandbook/ QAhandbook.doc

Fuinlong, C. (2000). The use of quality assurance models in Thai colleges and universities (Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.

Giertz, B. (2001, May). Anything goes? The concept of quality revisited. Paper presented at the 6th Quality in Higher Education Seminar, Birmingham, England.

Harvey, L. (2004). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26 (2), 207 - 223.

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9 - 34.

Julian, S. D., & Ofori - Dankwa, J. C. (2006). Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (2), 225 - 233.

Lejeune, C. (2011). Is continuous improvement through accreditation sustainable? Management Decision, 49(9),1535 - 1548.

Lejeune, C., & Vas, A. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness in business schools: A test of the accreditation impact. Journal of Management Development, 28 (8), 728 - 741.

Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1649 - 1665.

Orlans, H. (2002). The end of monopoly. Change, 32 (2), 61 - 80.

Prøitz, T. S., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2004). Accreditation, standards and diversity: An analysis of EQUIS accreditation reports. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (6), 735 -750.

Romero, E.J. (2008). AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245 - 255.

Sanyal, B. C., & Martin, M. (2007). Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake? Retrieved from http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099/8095

Selden, W.K. (1960). Why accreditation? The Journal of Higher Education, 31 (6), 296 - 301.

Stensaker, B. (2003). Trance, transparency and transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 9, 151 - 159.

Thrash, P.A. (1979). Accreditation: A perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 50 (2), 115 - 120.

Young, K. E. (1983). Understanding accreditation: Contemporary perspectives on issues and practices in evaluating educational quality. California : Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Zook, G.F., & Haggerty, M.E. (1936). Principles of accrediting higher education institutions. In, The evaluation of higher education institutions (Vol. I, p. 18). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.