Inclusion in Army : A Study of Acceptance of Women Leaders by Men in Uniform

Authors

  •   Anupama Munshi Research Scholar, Faculty of Management, Symbiosis International University, Gram : Lavale, Tal : Mulshi, Dist. Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra
  •   Suruchi Pandey Associate Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Management S tudies, Gram : Lavale, Tal : Mulshi, Pune - 412 115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i8/117426

Keywords:

Acceptance

, Women, Army, Leader, Inclusion

C8

, M50, M51

Paper Submission Date

, December 26, 2016, Paper sent back for Revision, July 4, 2017, Paper Acceptance Date, July 24, 2017.

Abstract

Inclusion is the order of the day. No organization is going to reach its full potential until there is a climate of inclusion in it. Traditionally, though some organizations, like the military, are branded as male organizations, but with the passage of time, even these organizations are expanding their boundaries and the mindset of people in them is evolving. With this underlying idea, this paper sought to understand the level of acceptance of military men for women officers in the Indian Army. The entry of women in the Indian Army is limited to the Officer Cadre in supporting Arms and Services. The paper was based on a systematic literature review and primary data collected from respondents to understand their mindset towards the acceptance and inclusion of women in the Indian Army.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-01

How to Cite

Munshi, A., & Pandey, S. (2017). Inclusion in Army : A Study of Acceptance of Women Leaders by Men in Uniform. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(8), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i8/117426

Issue

Section

Human Resources Management

References

Alexander, H. (2016, April 29). First woman in US army qualifies to lead troops in battle. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/29/first-woman-in-us-army-qualifies-to-lead-troops-in-battle/

At West Point, Biden lauds diversity in U.S. Army, women in combat roles. (2016, May 22). Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved from https://www.abqjournal.com/778577/at-west-point-biden-lauds-diversity-in-us-army-women-in-combat-roles.html

Ban on women in ground close combat roles lifted. (2016, July 8). Gov.uk. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ban-on-women-in-ground-close-combat-roles-lifted

Bhattacharyya, A. (2012). Women in military in India: The cry for parity. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (2), 317 - 325.

Boldry J., Wood W., & Kashy, D. A.(2001). Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4), 689 - 705.

By the numbers: Women in the U.S. military. (2013, January 24). CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/24/us/military-women-glance/index.html

Carreiras, H. (2009). The role of women in the armed forces of NATO countries: Military constraints and professional identities. Minerva : Quarterly Report on Women and the Military, 17 (3 - 4), 46 - 57.

Choudhary, N., Kumar, R., & Philip, P. J. (2016). Effects of transformational leadership on follower’s organizational behaviour : The moderating role of culture. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 9 (7), 23 -35. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i7/97785

Cohn, C. (2000). How can she claim equal rights when she doesn’t have to do as many push-ups as I do? The framing of men’s opposition to women’s equality in the military. Men & Masculinities, 3(2), 131 - 151.

Dash, S., & Mohapatra, J. (2016). Employee perception on the role of HR for creating and managing employer branding towards its brand : An explorative study. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 9 (2), 41-54. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i2/87242

Drake, M. J. (2006). Ambivalence at the academies: Attitudes toward women in the military at the Federal Service Academies. Social Thought & Research, 27, 43 - 68.

Dunn, M. (2007). British army leadership: Is it gendered? Women in Management Review, 22(6), 468 - 481.

Firestone, J. M. (1987). Sex-appropriate roles: Comparing the attitudes of civilian and military youth. Population Research and Policy Review, 6 (3), 275 - 296.

Gray, S. (2008). Discontinuing the Canadian military’s ‘special selection’ process for staff college and moving toward a viable and ethical integration of women into the senior officer corps. Journal of Military Ethics, 7 (4), 284 - 301.

Gustavsen, E. (2013). Equal treatment or equal opportunity ? Male attitudes towards women in the Norwegian and US armed forces. Acta Sociologica, 56 (4), 361-374.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Harrell, M. C. (2007). Assessing the assignment policy for army women (Vol. 590).Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation.

Herbert, M. S. (1994). Feminism, militarism, and attitudes toward the role of women in the military. Gender Issues, 14 (2), 25 - 48.

Ivarsson, S., Estrada, A. X., & Berggren, A. W. (2005). Understanding men’s attitudes toward women in the Swedish armed forces. Military Psychology, 17(4), 269 - 282.

Kumar, N., & Sudesh. (2016). Achieving gender balance in the boardroom : India vis-Ã -vis European countries. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 9 (7),49 - 59. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i7/97788

Kummel, G. (2002). Complete access: Women in the Bundeswehr and male ambivalence. Armed Forces & Society, 28 (4), 555 - 573.

Kurpius, S. E., & Lucart, AL. (2000). Military and civilian undergraduates: Attitudes towards women, masculinity, and authoritarianism. Sex Roles, 43 (3 - 4), 255 - 265.

Lahelma, E. (2005). Finding communalities, making differences, performing masculinities: Reflections of young men on military service. Gender & Education, 17(3), 305 - 317.

MacKenzie, M. (2015). Beyond the band of brothers: The U.S. military and the myth that women can't fight. United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press.

Mathers, J. G. (2000). Women in the Russian Armed Forces: A marriage of Convenience ? Minerva : Quarterly Report on Women and the Military, 18, 3 - 4.

Miller, F. A. (1998). Strategic culture change: The door to achieving high performance and inclusion. Public Personnel Management, 27 (2), 151-160.

Miller, L. L. (1997). Not just weapons of the weak: Gender harassment as a form of protest for army men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60 (1), 32 - 51.

Segal, D. R., & Segal, M. W. (2004). America's military population (Vol. 59, No. 4). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37 (4), 1262 - 1289.

Stiehm, J. H. (1998). Army opinions about women in the army. Gender Issues, 16(3), 88 - 98.

Vogt, D., Bruce, T. A., Street, A. E., & Stafford, J. (2007). Attitudes toward women and tolerance for sexual harassment among reservists. Violence Against Women, 13 (9),879 - 900.