New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

What Causes Product Returns in Online Purchases? A Review and Research Agenda

Open Access Original Article

What Causes Product Returns in Online Purchases? A Review and Research Agenda

Brajaballav Kar1,  Arvind Tripathy2,  Mallika Devi Pathak3

1 Associate Professor, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha

2 Assistant Professor, Marketing, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha

3 Ph.D. Scholar, KSOM, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha

Volume 15
Issue 4
Pages 46–62
Year 2022
Received: May 20, 2021 Accepted: March 15, 2022 Published: April 13, 2022
Abstract

The growth in e-commerce is an opportunity, but the resulting product return is a challenge. The complex and multidimensional nature of product return influences the manufacturer, product, retailer, channel, return policy, logistics service provider, customers, or any combination thereof. Compared to other economies, the level of product return is high in an emerging economy like India, which prompted this structured literature review. The literature pointed to the product return as a ‘moment of truth’ involving emerging practices like buy online return in store (BORIS), wardrobing, renting, bracketing, home-try programs, subscription than buy, and sending of curated choices to customers, which drastically change purchases as well as returns. The return policy, dynamic pricing, website design and usability, product category, and inventory visibility influence product returns. Fraudulent returns are of concern compared to legitimate returns. Customer attitude, informationseeking behavior, post-purchase dissonance, individual and group decisions, and different temporal variables make customers sensitive to return. Additionally, the product utility, competitive and comparative value, perceived fairness, and customer empowerment also influence returns. Switching physical processes to online creates an additional challenge. A comprehensive understanding of product return in online purchase situations is expected to create value for customers and agents in the value chain. Effective information sharing across the value chain and within an organization can adjust the inevitable product returns to an optimal level and ensure multi-channel interoperability.

Keywords Product Return Online Purchase Customer Attitude Supply Chain
How to Cite

Brajaballav Kar, Arvind Tripathy, Mallika Devi Pathak (2022). What Causes Product Returns in Online Purchases? A Review and Research Agenda. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(4), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i4/162837

References
  1. Abbey, J., Ketzenberg, M., & Metters, R. (2018). A more profitable approach to product returns. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(1), 1–6. https://mitsmr.com/2v09gtB
  2. Altug, M. S., & Aydinliyim, T. (2016). Counteracting strategic purchase deferrals: The impact of online retailers' return policy decisions. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 18(3), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0570
  3. Appriss Retail. (2018). Consumer returns in the retail industry. https://appriss.com/retail/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/12/AR3018_2018-Customer-Returns-in-the-Retail-Industry_Digital.pdf
  4. Banerjee, N., Dutta, A., & Dasgupta, T. (2010). A study on customers' attitude towards online shopping - An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Marketing, 40(11), 36–42. http://indianjournalofmarketing.com/index.php/ijom/article/view/37374
  5. Bansal, V. (2018, January 17). Product returns: Fashion e-comm firms like Flipkart, Myntra uncover fake product returns. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/fashion-e-comm-firms-like-flipkart-myntra-uncover-fake-product-returns/62533671
  6. Barker, T. J., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2008). Reverse logistics network design: A conceptual framework for decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802591196
  7. Batarfi, R., Jaber, M. Y., & Aljazzar, S. M. (2017). A profit maximization for a reverse logistics dual-channel supply chain with a return policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 106, 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2017.01.024
  8. Buhler, B. (2018). Returns: The value conundrum. https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-95/accenture-postal-vision-2020-returns-slideshare.pdf
  9. Cook, S. C., & Yurchisin, J. (2017). Fast fashion environments: Consumer's heaven or retailer's nightmare? International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 45(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2016-0027
  10. Cui, H., Rajagopalan, S., & Ward, A. R. (2020a). Predicting product return volume using machine learning methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(3), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.046
  11. Cui, H., Rajagopalan, S., & Ward, A. R. (2020b). Impact of task-level worker specialization, workload, and product personalization on consumer returns. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0836
  12. Dailey, L. C., & Ülkü, M. A. (2018). Retailers beware: On denied product returns and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 86, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.064
  13. Dzyabura, D., El Kihal, S., Hauser, J. R., & Ibragimov, M. (2019). Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209307
  14. Foscht, T., Ernstreiter, K., Maloles, C., Sinha, I., & Swoboda, B. (2013). Retaining or returning? : Some insights for a better understanding of return behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551311304310
  15. Ganguly, P. (2016, November 22). E-commerce players in India bring down product returns this festive season. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/e-commerce-players-in-india-bring-down-product-returns-this-festive-season/55553507
  16. Gelbrich, K., Gäthke, J., & Hübner, A. (2017). Rewarding customers who keep a product: How reinforcement affects customers' product return decision in online retailing. Psychology & Marketing, 34(9), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21027
  17. Griffis, S. E., Rao, S., Goldsby, T. J., & Niranjan, T. T. (2012). The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.002
  18. Han, Y., Chandukala, S. R., & Che, H. (2017). Exchange and refund of complementary products. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9393-7
  19. Harris, L. C. (2008). Fraudulent return proclivity: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.09.003
  20. Hellemann, N. J., & Brettel, M. (2016). The impact of website stimuli on product returns in online retailing: A structured abstract. In, K. Kim (eds), Celebrating America's pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_10
  21. Jack, L., Frei, R., & Krzyzaniak, S.- A. (2019). The challenges and opportunities of product returns in a multichannel environment. https://institutducommerce.org/medias/publications/Final Report on Online Returns.pdf
  22. Jain, K., Gautam, S., & Pasricha, D. (2018). The pleasure and the guilt - Impulse purchase and post purchase regret: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121984
  23. Jaiswal, A. K., Niraj, R., Park, C. H., & Agarwal, M. K. (2018). The effect of relationship and transactional characteristics on customer retention in emerging online markets. Journal of Business Research, 92, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.007
  24. Kar, S. S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2009). Organised retailing in India: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Marketing, 39(11), 10–14. http://52.172.159.94/index.php/ijom/article/view/37102
  25. Khare, A., Khare, A., Mukherjee, S., & Goyal, T. (2016). Do consumer shopping styles influence consumer attitudes toward services offered by shopping websites? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2015.1072075
  26. Kincade, D. H., Giddings, V. L., & Chen-Yu, H. J. (1998). Impact of product-specific variables on consumers' post-consumption behaviour for apparel products: USA. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 22(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.1998.tb00718.x
  27. Koufaris, M., Kambil, A., & Labarbera, P. A. (2001). Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044233
  28. Kumar, A., & Anjaly, B. (2017). How to measure post-purchase customer experience in online retailing? A scale development study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(12), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2017-0002
  29. Kumar, N., & Gupta, U. (2017). Factors influencing online purchase behaviour of customers in tier III cities of India - A factor analysis approach. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 6(1), 29–36. http://www.publishingindia.com
  30. Kumar, P., & Kanchan. (2019). Purchasing criteria for apparels among Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i1/140606
  31. Kumar, S. (2019). Consumer preference towards private label brands with reference to retail apparel in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(7), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i7/145404
  32. Kurup, A. J., & Jain, P. (2018). Effect of e-loyalty cues on repurchase behavioural intentions among online shoppers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(11), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i11/137982
  33. Lee, S., & Yi, Y. (2017). “Seize the Deal, or Return It Losing Your Free Gift”: The effect of a gift-with-purchase promotion on product return intention. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20986
  34. Lepthien, A., & Clement, M. (2019). Shipping fee schedules and return behavior. Marketing Letters, 30(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09486-8
  35. Li, Y., Xu, L., & Li, D. (2013). Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.03.013
  36. Lohse, T., Kemper, J., & Brettel, M. (2017). How online customer reviews affect sales and return behavior–An empirical analysis in fashion e-commerce. Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5–10, 2017, 2635–2644. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rip/16
  37. Martin, M. J. (2016). Customers' determination of service quality and satisfaction in a return/repair process: A quantitative study. International Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 20(1), 36.
  38. Misra, S., & Arivazhagan, D. (2017). Application of design thinking techniques in marketing of fashion apparel e-commerce. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i8/117430
  39. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  40. Narvar. (2018). The state of returns: What today's shoppers expect. Narvar Consumer Report 2018. https://see.narvar.com/rs/249-TEC-877/images/Consumer-Report-Returns-2018-4.3.pdf
  41. Pei, Z., & Paswan, A. (2018). Consumers' legitimate and opportunistic product return behaviors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 301–319.
  42. Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2015). Perceived risk, product returns, and optimal resource allocation: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0174
  43. Pham, T. S., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.003
  44. Powers, T. L., & Lord, J. C. (2018). An examination of retail product return behavior based on category of good: An abstract (pp. 101–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_29
  45. Radhi, M., & Zhang, G. (2018). Pricing policies for a dual-channel retailer with cross-channel returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.020
  46. Rajan, C. R., Swaminathan, T. N., & Pavithra, M. R. (2017). Key drivers of purchase intent by Indian consumers in omni-channel shopping. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(5), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i5/114233
  47. Rao, S., Rabinovich, E., & Raju, D. (2014). The role of physical distribution services as determinants of product returns in Internet retailing. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.005
  48. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Kuntze, R. (2003). The relationship between anomie and unethical retail disposition. Psychology and Marketing, 20(12), 1067–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10109
  49. Saarijärvi, H., Sutinen, U.-M., & Harris, L. C. (2017). Uncovering consumers' returning behaviour: A study of fashion e-commerce. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 27(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2017.1314863
  50. Sahoo, N., Dellarocas, C., & Srinivasan, S. (2018). The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0736
  51. Salema, M. I., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Novais, A. Q. (2010). Simultaneous design and planning of supply chains with reverse flows: A generic modelling framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.08.002
  52. Samorani, M., Alptekinoglu, A., & Messinger, P. R. (2019). Product return episodes in retailing. Service Science, 11(4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1287/SERV.2019.0250
  53. Seo, J. Y., Yoon, S., & Vangelova, M. (2016). Shopping plans, buying motivations, and return policies : Impacts on product returns and purchase likelihoods. Marketing Letters, 27(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9381-y
  54. Variyar, M. (2018, December 05). Amazon gets more product returns in India than any other markets. ETtech. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/amazon-gets-more-product-returns-in-india-than-any-other-markets/66946547
  55. Xu, L., Li, Y., Govindan, K., & Xu, X. (2015). Consumer returns policies with endogenous deadline and supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.049
  56. Xu, X., & Jackson, J. E. (2019). Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.011
  57. Yan, R., & Cao, Z. (2017). Product returns, asymmetric information, and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.001
  58. Zhou, W., & Hinz, O. (2016). Determining profit-optimizing return policies–A two-step approach on data from taobao.com. Electronic Markets, 26(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0198-6
  59. Zhou, W., Hinz, O., & Benlian, A. (2018). The impact of the package opening process on product returns. Business Research, 11(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0055-x
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines