New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Trends and Future Directions of Accreditations in Higher Education : Bibliometric Analysis

Open Access Original Article

Trends and Future Directions of Accreditations in Higher Education : Bibliometric Analysis

J. Srikanth Reddy1,  Ritu Sharma2,  Amit Kumar Gupta3

1 Research Scholar, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad - 121 004, Haryana

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Humanities, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad - 121 004, Haryana

3 Assistant Professor, Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Block C, Sukhrali, Sector 17, Gurugram - 122 007, Haryana

Volume 16
Issue 6
Pages 39–59
Year 2023
Received: Aug. 10, 2022 Accepted: May 20, 2023 Published: June 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose : The study aimed to highlight the importance of accreditation in higher education and its relevance in enhancing the quality and standardization of the education system. The purpose of this research was to analyze the trends and future directions of accreditation in higher education using bibliometric analysis. Specifically, the study aimed to identify the relationship between accreditation-originating countries and top publishing countries in this domain, assess the relevance of accreditation over time, and propose future research areas through citation analysis and thematic evaluation.

Design/Methodology/Approach : The bibliometric method was used in our research to study and explore accreditation in higher education research. Bibliometric analysis is famous for quantitative data analysis. Using the relevant keywords in the Scopus database, we performed a bibliometric analysis on 1,544 articles. We used the biblioshiny tool through “R†open-source software for performance analysis and thematic mapping analysis, and VOSviewer was used for co-occurrence keyword analysis and network analysis.

Findings : The findings of the analysis substantiate with literature to infer the relationship between accreditation-originating countries and top countries publishing in this domain. The findings revealed that the relevance of accreditation has been increasing over the years, and the accreditation-originating countries were leading the research through publications in this area. The study proposed future research areas using citation analysis and thematic evaluation.

Practical Implications : The implications are relevant to higher education institutes, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The study is expected to be a catalyst in driving the research in the area of accreditation in higher education.

Novelty : This study's novelty is its use of bibliometric analysis to explore the trends and future directions of accreditations in higher education. The study also highlighted the increasing relevance of accreditation in enhancing the quality and standardization of the education system. The study is expected to be a catalyst for driving research in the area of accreditations in higher education.

Keywords Accreditation higher education quality international accreditations AACSB EQUIS AMBA
How to Cite

J. Srikanth Reddy, Ritu Sharma, Amit Kumar Gupta (2023). Trends and Future Directions of Accreditations in Higher Education : Bibliometric Analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(6), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i6/172863

References
  1. Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-010-0190-Z
  2. Ahuja, D., & Madan, P. (2022). Fifty years of research on Vedas: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(8), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i8/171526
  3. Alajoutsijärvi, K., Kettunen, K., & Sohlo, S. (2018). Shaking the status quo: Business accreditation and positional competition. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0199
  4. Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9(6), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061011
  5. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  6. Bagga, T. (2017). Accreditation compulsion or inducement: A perception study of various stakeholders. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977
  7. Bagga, T., Bansal, S., Kumar, P., & Jain, S. (2016). New wave of accreditation in Indian higher education : Comparison of accreditation bodies for management programmes. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(8), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i8/99778
  8. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of managerial finance: A retrospective. Managerial Finance, 46(11), 1495–1517. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2019-0277
  9. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty years of the Journal of Futures Markets : A bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22211
  10. Boelen, C., & Woollard, B. (2009). Social accountability and accreditation: A new frontier for educational institutions. Medical Education, 43(9), 887–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x
  11. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  12. Chaman Sab, M., Kappi, M., Bagalkoti, V., & Biradar, B. S. (2020). Indian Journal of Marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/I4/151574
  13. Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2168-9830.2008.TB00983.X
  14. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2010.10.002
  15. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.04.004
  16. Dinh, N. T., Dinh Hai, L., & Pham, H.-H. (2023). A bibliometric review of research on employability: Dataset from Scopus between 1972 and 2019. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-02-2022-0031
  17. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  18. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N., & Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 135, 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015
  19. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Ranaweera, C., Pattnaik, D., & Gustafsson, A. (2022). Mapping of Journal of Services Marketing themes: A retrospective overview using bibliometric analysis. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-04-2020-0122
  20. Gibbs, P. (2001). Higher education as a market: A problem or solution? Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070020030733
  21. Golub, J. S., Weiss, P. S., Ramesh, A. K., Ossoff, R. H., & Johns III, M. M. (2007). Burnout in residents of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: A national inquiry into the health of residency training. Academic Medicine, 82(6), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0B013E3180556825
  22. Henzi, D., Davis, E., Jasinevicius, R., & Hendricson, W. (2007). In the students’ own words: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? Journal of Dental Education, 71(5), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.5.tb04320.x
  23. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.5090140103
  24. Knight, J. (2013). The changing landscape of higher education internationalisation - For better or worse? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2012.753957
  25. Kundu, G. K. (2020). Modeling the critical barriers to implementation of AACSB accreditation in business schools. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(2), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-03-2019-0118
  26. Lejeune, C., & Vas, A. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness in business schools: A test of the accreditation impact. Journal of Management Development, 28(8), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910985504
  27. Liu, S. S., Meyerson, B., King, J., Yih, Y., & Ostovari, M. (2017). Drivers and barriers for adopting accreditation at local health departments for their performance improvement effort. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 23(6), e25–e35. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000567
  28. Lowrie, A., & Willmott, H. (2009). Accreditation sickness in the consumption of business education: The vacuum in AACSB standard setting. Management Learning, 40(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609335851
  29. Ludhani, K. K., Kumar, S., & Panda, S. K. (2023). A bibliometric overview of Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management between 2011 and 2021. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i1/172666
  30. Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1353/JHE.2006.0025
  31. Muslimin, A. I., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). Bibliometric analysis on an Indonesian English education department academic staffs’ productivities and its potential for national accreditation stance. Journal of Scientometric Research, 11(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.27
  32. NBA Accreditation. (2021). Accreditation. www.nbaind.org/accreditation
  33. Noyons, E. C., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J
  34. Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.483
  35. Pollack, J., & Adler, D. (2015). Emergent trends and passing fads in project management research: A scientometric analysis of changes in the field. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.011
  36. Prashar, A., & Sunder, V. M. (2020). A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118665
  37. Reddy, J. S., Gupta, N., & Sharma, R. (2022). To investigate the key antecedents of the acceptance of accreditations in business schools. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4027041
  38. Reddy, J. S., Sharma, R., & Gupta, N. (2023). Virtual accreditation peer review team visits – Higher education accreditations: Present and future directions. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, (Vol. ahead-of-print) No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-06-2022-0140
  39. Romero, E. J. (2008). AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.32712622
  40. Sahay, B. S., & Thakur, R. R. (2007). Excellence through accreditation in Indian B-schools. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 8(4), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396529
  41. Singh, S., & Singh, A. (2021). Importance of perception as a parameter in university rankings: A critical evaluation. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(11), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i11/166979
  42. Sinha, V., & Subramanian, K. S. (2013). Accreditation in India: Path of achieving educational excellence. Business Education & Accreditation, 5(2), 107–116.
  43. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature : A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  44. Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300110
  45. Tuppal, C. P., Gallardo-Ninobla, M. M., Arquiza, G. S., & Vega, P. D. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the Philippine Journal of Nursing for 1966–2017. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 89(1), 32–40. https://www.herdin.ph/index.php/herdin-home?view=research&cid=71335
  46. Ubgade, P. N., & Joshi, S. (2022). A review of brand anthropomorphism: Analysis of trends and research. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(10), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i10/172408
  47. Usher, R. (2002). A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy? Higher Education Research & Development, 21(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220144060
  48. Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0027
  49. Wu, Y.-C., Huang, S., Kuo, L., & Wu, W.-H. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.3.zqr520
  50. Yaghmour, N. A., Brigham, T. P., Richter, T., Miller, R. S., Philibert, I., Baldwin Jr., D. C., & Nasca, T. J. (2017). Causes of death of residents in ACGME-accredited programs 2000 through 2014: Implications for the learning environment. Academic Medicine, 92(7), 976–983. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001736
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines