New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

The Leadership Gender Gap in HEI Spaces - A Conceptual Framework

Open Access Original Article

The Leadership Gender Gap in HEI Spaces - A Conceptual Framework

Archana Singh1,  B. Parandhaman2,  Dimple Saini3

1 Associate Professor, Balaji Institute of International Business, Affiliated to Sri Balaji University Pune, S. No. 55/2-7, Tathawade, Off Mumbai-Bangalore Bypass, Pune - 411 033, Maharashtra

2 Principal Director, Sri Balaji Society, Affiliated to Sri Balaji University Pune, S. No. 55/2-7, Tathawade, Off Mumbai-Bangalore Bypass, Pune - 411 033, Maharashtra

3 Professor, Balaji Institute of Human Resource Development, Affiliated to Sri Balaji University Pune, S. No. 55/2-7, Tathawade, Off Mumbai-Bangalore Bypass, Pune - 411 033, Maharashtra

Volume 14
Issue 8
Pages 25–39
Year 2021
Received: Jan. 10, 2021 Accepted: June 15, 2021 Published: Aug. 31, 2021
Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of the paper was to recognize and categorize the key enablers of leadership gender gap in HEI (higher education institutions) spaces and to model these for the education sector. The research paper was an attempt to develop a conceptual framework addressing the leadership gender gap in HEI spaces. We used extant literature review and expert opinions to recognize the enablers and barriers to leadership gender gap in HEI spaces for women.

Research Design : The research process was systematically framed. It comprised of primary and secondary data. We used TISM (total interpretive structural modelling) as a tool to understand linkages between latent variables and to individually deduce and diagnose the transitive relation between the variables. The proposed model is further extended to understand the nature of the variables calibrated using fuzzy MICMAC analysis.

Findings : The hierarchical relationship between the variables shows how leadership style, gender audit, and feminization in HEIs is mediated through gender leadership and women's status leading to gender inclusion based on which the TISM Model of Leadership Gender Gap in HEI Spaces has been obtained as the outcome.

Research Limitations : The study was based on expert opinion and can be statistically tested by using any advanced techniques in order to fully utilize the advantage of this methodology. The framework explains the complicated associations among the enablers, which can be further validated with a larger sample size statistically.

Originality/Value : This paper made an attempt to contribute to the field of HEI spaces, which is the need of the time. This is an original and novel study conducted to understand about the leadership gender gap in Indian HEIs by utilizing the TISM approach.

Keywords Total Interpretive Structural Methodology Higher Education Institutions MICMAC Leadership Gender
How to Cite

Archana Singh, B. Parandhaman, Dimple Saini (2021). The Leadership Gender Gap in HEI Spaces - A Conceptual Framework. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(8), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i8/165677

References
  1. Addi-Raccah, A. (2006). Women in the Israeli educational system. In, Women principals in a multicultural society (pp. 49–68). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901141_005
  2. Breitenbach, E., & Wasoff, F. (2007). A gender audit of statistics : Comparing the position of women and men in Scotland. Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Social Research.
  3. Case, K. A., Kanenberg, H., Erich, S., & Tittsworth, J. (2012). Transgender inclusion in university non-discrimination statements : Challenging gender - conforming privilege through student activism. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 145–161.
  4. Catalano, D. C. (2015). Beyond virtual equality : Liberatory consciousness as a path to achieve trans* inclusion in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1056763
  5. Chanana, K. (2020). Women and leadership: Strategies of gender inclusion in institutions of higher education in India. In G. Crimmins (ed.), Strategies for supporting inclusion and diversity in the academy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_8
  6. Cohen Miller, A. S., & Lewis, J. L. (2019). Gender audit as research method for organizational learning and change in higher education. In, V. Demos, M. Segal, & K. Kelly (eds.) Gender and practice : Insights from the field (Advances in gender research, Vol. 27, pp. 39–55). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2126201927
  7. Depaepe, M., Lauwers, H., & Simon, F. (2006). The feminization of the teaching profession in Belgium in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In, Women and teaching (pp. 155–183). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403984371_7
  8. Drudy, S. (2008). Gender balance/gender bias : The teaching profession and the impact of feminisation. Gender and Education, 20(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802190156
  9. Dunn, D., Gerlach, J. M., & Hyle, A. E. (2014). Gender and leadership : Reflections of women in higher education administration. International Journal of Leadership and Change, 2(1), Article 2. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijlc/vol2/iss1/2
  10. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles : A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
  11. Eddy, P. L., & VanDerLinden, K. E. (2006). Emerging definitions of leadership in higher education : New visions of leadership or same old “hero” leader ? Community College Review, 34(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552106289703
  12. Elias, J. (2011). The gender politics of economic competitiveness in Malaysia's transition to a knowledge economy. The Pacific Review, 24(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.596564
  13. García-Holgado, A., Mena, J., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & González, C. (2018, April). Inclusion of gender perspective in computer engineering careers : Elaboration of a questionnaire to assess the gender gap in tertiary education. In, 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1547–1554). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363417
  14. Hamilton, K., & Jenkins, L. (2000). A gender audit for public transport : A new policy tool in the tackling of social exclusion. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1793–1800. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080411
  15. Joshi, M., & Bisht, D. (2019). Empirical study of emotional intelligence among higher-education teachers and role of certifications on emotional intelligence levels. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 12(2), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i2/141755
  16. Krietz - Sandberg, S. (2013). Gender inclusion and horizontal gender segregation: Stakeholders' strategies and dilemmas in Swedish teachers' education. Gender and Education, 25(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.772566
  17. Kumar, A. A., & Shekhar, V. (2017). Invigorating knowledge sharing in higher education : Indian initiatives. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10(9), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i9/118235
  18. Kurup, A. J., Pandey, S., & Charfare, M. (2020). Mediating effects of factors influencing career satisfaction of women academicians in higher education. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151823
  19. Morley, L. (2005). Gender equity in Commonwealth higher education. Women's Studies International Forum, 28(2–3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.008
  20. Morley, L. (2013). International trends in women's leadership in higher education. In, M. Stiasny & T. Gore (eds.), Going global : Identifying the trends and drivers of international education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/42929
  21. Odhiambo, G. (2011). Women and higher education leadership in Kenya : A critical analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 667– 678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2011.621192
  22. Peterson, H. (2016). Is managing academics “women's work” ? Exploring the glass cliff in higher education management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214563897
  23. Psychogios, A. G. (2007). Towards the transformational leader : Addressing women's leadership style in modern business management. Journal of Business and Society, 20(1/2), 169–180.
  24. Qureshi, M. I., Zaman, K., & Bhatti, M. N. (2011). The impact of culture and gender on leadership behavior : Higher education and management perspective. Management Science Letters, 1(4), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2011.05.008
  25. Ramanathan, V. (2018). Internalization of higher education in India : Existing realities and future outlook. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 11(6), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i6/128441
  26. Reciniello, S. (2011). Is woman the future of man ? : An exploration of the potential of women in the knowledge economy and of the problem of gender inequality in the workplace. Organisational and Social Dynamics, 11(2), 151–174.
  27. Rosener, J.B. (2011) Ways women lead. In, P. Werhane & M. Painter-Morland (eds), Leadership, gender, and organization. Issues in Business Ethics (Vol. 27). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90481-9014-0_3
  28. Vashisht, S., & Vashisht, R. (2020). Student to faculty incivility : Experience of faculty in higher education institutions and its consequences. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 13(5–7), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i5-7/153082
  29. Vijayakumar, G. (2013). “I'll Be Like Water” : Gender, class, and flexible aspirations at the edge of India's knowledge economy. Gender & Society, 27(6), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213499445
  30. Walby, S., Gottfried, H., Gottschall, K., & Osawa, M. (eds.). (2006). Gendering the knowledge economy : Comparative perspectives. Springer.
  31. Young, P. (2004). Leadership and gender in higher education : A case study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000161841
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines