New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements, Well-Being, and Performance of Employees During the COVID -19 Pandemic

Open Access Original Article

Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements, Well-Being, and Performance of Employees During the COVID -19 Pandemic

Rupali Arora1,  Pratibha2

1 Professor, University School of Business, Chandigarh University, Ludhiana- Chandigarh State Highway, Mohali - 140 413, Punjab

2 Assistant Professor, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran - 140 307, Kharar-Banur Highway, Punjab

Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 8–23
Year 2022
Received: June 20, 2021 Accepted: Jan. 25, 2022 Published: Feb. 17, 2022
Abstract

The primary purpose of the present research paper was to investigate the influence of flexible work arrangements on personal and family well-being and performance of employees. The study also examined the moderating role of managerial support on the relationship between flexible work arrangements and well-being & performance. The target respondents were the teleworkers employed with Indian IT organizations located in North India. Data were gathered from 412 teleworkers to study the hypotheses, and Smart PLS 2.0 was employed to analyze the data. The results revealed a significant relationship between flexible work arrangements, personal and family well-being, and employee performance. The study further confirmed the significant and moderating effect of managerial support on the relationship between flexible work arrangements and performance. During the work-from-home policies at the workplace, the employees perceived that receiving support from the managers helped them perform well. As the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the economies globally, the present study’s findings would be essential for the managers to support their employees during such crises.

Keywords Flexible Work Arrangements Well-being Employee Performance Teleworkers IT Sector
How to Cite

Rupali Arora, Pratibha (2022). Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements, Well-Being, and Performance of Employees During the COVID -19 Pandemic. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(2), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i2/168332

References
  1. Albion, M. J. (2004). A measure of attitudes towards flexible work options. Australian Journal of Management, 29(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F031289620402900207
  2. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1529100615593273
  3. Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching–learning process : A study of higher education teachers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825
  4. Baert, S., Lippens, L., Moens, E., Weytjens, J., & Sterkens, P. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis and telework: A research survey on experiences, expectations, and hopes (Working Paper). Ghent University.
  5. Baruch, Y. (2001). The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00058
  6. Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canonico, E. (2019). Telework: Outcomes and facilitators for employees. In, R. N. Landers (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (pp. 511–543). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Bedi, M. B., & Khurana, S. (2020). HR outbreak management and organizational performance in the emerging pandemic scenario: A comprehensive review. Mukt Shabd Journal, 9(4), 4509–4516.
  8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
  9. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
  10. Chakraborty, D., & Altekar, S. (2021). Work from home (WFH), COVID-19, and its impact on women. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(9), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i9/166294
  11. Chandra, V. (2012). Work–life balance: Eastern and Western perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 1040–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.651339
  12. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling techniques (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
  14. Cooper, R., & Baird, M. (2015). Bringing the “right to request” flexible working arrangements to life: From policies to practices. Employee Relations, 37(5), 568– 581.
  15. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206305279602
  16. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  17. Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336– 361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104
  19. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01605
  20. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77– 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
  21. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  22. Harpaz, I. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization and society. Work Study, 51(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210418791
  23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  24. Hill, E. J., Grzywacz, J. G., Allen, S., Blanchard, V. L., Matz-Costa, C., Shulkin, S., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work & Family, 11(2), 149–163.https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802024678
  25. Jamal, M. T., Anwar, I., Khan, N. A., & Saleem, I. (2021). Work during COVID-19: Assessing the influence of job demands and resources on practical and psychological outcomes for employees. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2020-0149
  26. Johnson, L. C., Andrey, J., & Shaw, S. M. (2007). Mr. Dithers comes to dinner: Telework and the merging of women's work and home domains in Canada. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701213701
  27. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 is a moderating variable with its own moderating factors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1–2), 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.38
  28. Ko, J., Hur, S., & Smith-Walter, A. (2013). Family-friendly work practices and job satisfaction and organizational performance: Moderating effects of managerial support and performance-oriented management. Public Personnel Management, 42(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0091026013505503
  29. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van Buuren, S., Van der Beek, A. J., & De Vet, H. C. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
  30. Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Klein, M. (2021). Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120656
  31. Martin, B. H., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211238820
  32. Maruyama, T., & Tietze, S. (2012). From anxiety to assurance: Concerns and outcomes of telework. Personnel Review, 41(4), 450– 469.https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211229375
  33. Maruyama, T., Hopkinson, P. G., & James, P. W. (2009). A multivariate analysis of work–life balance outcomes from a large - scale telework programme. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00219.x
  34. Morgan, R. E. (2004). Teleworking: An assessment of the benefits and challenges. European Business Review, 16(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340410699613
  35. Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
  36. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  37. Raghuram, S., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2004). Work - non work conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management, 43(2–3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20019
  38. Rahman, M. F., Kistyanto, A., & Surjanti, J. (2020). Flexible work arrangements in COVID-19 pandemic era, influence employee performance: The mediating role of innovative work behavior. International Journal of Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Research, 6(2), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2020.622
  39. Rashmi, K., Kataria, A., & Singh, R. (2021). Work-life balance: A review and future research agenda. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 14(2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i2/157690
  40. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support : A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698– 714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698
  41. Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2014). Reordering spatial and social relations: A case study of professional and managerial flexworkers. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12017
  42. Shockley, K., Thompson, C., & Andreassi, J. (2013). Workplace culture and work-life integration. In D. Major & R. Burke (eds.), Handbook of work–life integration of professionals: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 310– 333). Edward Elgar.
  43. Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00046.x
  44. Starr, E., Ganco, M., & Campbell, B. A. (2018). Strategic human capital management in the context of cross - industry and within - industry mobility frictions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2226–2254. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2906
  45. Stavrou, E. T. (2005). Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A cross - national study of the European work context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(8), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.356
  46. Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069–1083. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1069
  47. Taskin, L., & Edwards, P. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00194.x
  48. Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30
  49. Taylor, D. S., & Kavanaugh, J. K. (2005). Developing a model of leadership in the teleworking environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 9(2), 73– 96.
  50. Wassem, M., Baig, S. A., Abrar, M., Hashim, M., Zia-Ur-Rehman, M., Awan, U., Amjad, F., & Nawab, Y. (2019). Impact of capacity building and managerial support on employees' performance: The moderating role of employees' retention. SAGE Open, 9(3), 2158244019859957. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244019859957
  51. Wong, A. H., Cheung, J. O., & Chen, Z. (2021). Promoting effectiveness of “working from home”: Findings from Hong Kong working population under COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 210– 228. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0139
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines