Private sector organizations provide huge employment opportunities to women, and women make remarkable contributions to various organizations in the private sectors of the economy. This study analyzed the quality of work life of women employees in private sector organizations on the basis of their demographic factors, and 96 women employees working in various private sector organizations located in Ernakulam district of Kerala were purposively selected in a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Harvard Professor Richard E. Walton's eight-dimension scale was utilized to measure the quality of work life perception among women employees. Non-parametric tests such as Mann - Whitney U test, Kruskal - Wallis H test, and Pearsons's correlation were used as the major data analysis tools in the present study. It was observed that a significant difference existed between marital status of the respondents for work and total life space; educational qualification for social relevance of work life; organization type for adequate and fair compensation, constitutionalism, and social relevance of work life; work experience for social integration in the work organization; and monthly income for adequate and fair compensation, opportunities to use and develop human capacities, opportunity for continued growth and security, and social relevance of work life. It was also revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between the overall quality of work life and the majority of each dimensions of QWL.

1. Aggarwal, M. (2010). Research methodology trends and techniques. Jaipur: Aadi Publications.
2. Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and organization: The conflict between system and the individual. Oxford, England: Harpers.
3. Bhattacharyya, D. K. (2006). Human resource management. New Delhi: Excel Books.
4. Bolhari, A., Rezaeean, A., Bolhari, J., & Bairamzadeh, S. (2011). The relationship between quality of work life and demographic characteristics of information technology staffs. 2011 International Conference on Computer Communication and Management, Proc. of CSIT, 5, 374 - 378.
5. Efraty, D., & Sirgy, M. J. (1990). The effects of quality of working life (QWL) on employee behavioral responses. Social Indicators Research, 22 (1), 31- 47.
6. Ghosh, B. (2002). Human resources development and management. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
7. Gupta, B. (2015). An empirical study of impact of demographic variables on quality of work life among insurance sector employees in Indore Division. Pacific Business Review International, 8(1), 24 - 32.
8. Gupta, B., & Hyde, A. M. (2013). Demographical study on quality of work life in nationalized banks. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 17 (3), 223 - 231. DOI : <a href=https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262913496727 target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262913496727</a>
9. Kala, K., Jan, N. A., Subramani, A., & Banureka, R. (2017). Upshot of occupational stress on work life balance of employees working in information technology organizations in Chennai. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10 (7), 50 - 59. doi:10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i7/116494
10. Lee, D.-J., Singhapakdi, A., & Sirgy, M. J. (2007). Further validation of a need-based quality-of-work-life (QWL) measure: Evidence from marketing practitioners. Applied Research Quality Life, 2, 273 -287.
11. Maghaminejad, F., & Adib-Hajbaghery, M. (2016). Faculty members quality of work life in Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2012. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 5 (4), doi: 10.17795/nmsjournal35921
12. Mathur, R. N. (1989). Quality of working life of women construction workers. New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers.
13. Moradi, T., Maghaminejad, F., & Azizi-Fini, I. (2014). Quality of working life of nurses and its related factors. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 3(2). Retrieved from <a href=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228533/ target="_blank">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228533/</a>
14. Nayak, T., Sahoo, C. K., & Mohanty, P. K. (2015). Predictors of perceived quality of work life of employees: Empirical evidence from Indian health sector. Udyog Pragati, 39 (2), 1-16.
15. Pareek, U., & Rao, T. V. (1981). Designing and managing human resource systems. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
16. Sirgy, M., Efraty, D., Siegel, P., & Lee, D. - J. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55 (3), 241- 302.
17. Swapna, M., & Gomathi, S. (2013). A study on the interplay between the constructs of quality of work life: With special reference to IT professionals in Bangalore City. Asian Social Science, 9 (9), 107 - 122. doi : <a href=https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n9p107 target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n9p107</a>
18. Toppo, L., & Yadav, S. P. (2015). An empirical study on employees' quality of work life: A case study of Bokaro Steel Plant an integrated unit of Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL). Pacific Business Review International, 7(11), 53 - 60.
19. Walton, R. (1973). Quality of work life: What is it? Sloan Management Review Journal, 15 (1), 11 - 21.
20. Yeo, R. K., & Li, J. (2011). Working out the quality of work life: A career development perspective with insights for human resource management. Human Resource Management International Digest, 19 (3), 39 - 45. DOI : <a href=https://doi.org/10.1108/09670731111125952 target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1108/09670731111125952</a>