Purpose : The study aimed to explore the mediating role of task and work responsibility idiosyncratic deal (I-deal) and prosocial motivation toward the shared relationship between perceived supervisor’s support and in-role job performance of female academicians in higher education institutions (HEIs).

Design/Methodology/Approach : The study was conducted among female academicians of private higher education institutes of Chhattisgarh, with a sample size of 476, comprising 397 female academicians and 79 Dean/Associate Dean/Registrar/HoDs (for prosocial motivation). A structural equation modelling (SEM) method was used to develop and examine the sequential mediation model through SPSS and Hayes PROCESS Model 6.

Findings : The results revealed that the perceived supervisor’s support positively and significantly affected the in-role job performance with an effect size of 0.402 under the confidence interval of 95% and a confidence interval with a range of 0.301 to 0.502. It was also revealed that the perceived supervisor’s support positively influenced the task and work responsibility I-deal but negatively influenced prosocial motivation with an effect of 0.827 and –0.159, respectively. The mediation effect of prosocial motivation showed a negative but significant effect on the relationship between the perceived supervisor’s support and in-role job performance with an effect size of –0.117, while task and work responsibility I-deal had an insignificant mediating effect. Additionally, the task and work responsibility I-deal and prosocial motivation did not play a significant sequential mediating effect in the shared perceived supervisor’s support and in-role job performance relationship.

Practical Implications : Based upon the outcome of this research, the policymakers and leaders can design a strategic framework for creating collaborative and supportive work environments in HEIs to improve the employee’s in-job performance. In designing the framework, they should consider the role of supervisors to support their employees in terms of work negotiation, particularly when there is a low prosocial motivation.

Originality : This research aimed to thoroughly examine the customized work arrangements and prosocial motivation among female faculty members in HEIs. Future research should focus on other geographical areas and different organizational setups to derive an effective strategy for improving the work culture and performance.

1. Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2017). Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533176
2. Bal, M., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals between employees and organizations: Conceptual issues, applications and the role of co-workers (1st ed.). Routledge.
3. Bal, P. M., & Dorenbosch, L. (2015). Age-related differences in the relations between individualized HRM and organizational performance: A large-scale employer survey. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12058
4. Bal, P. M., van Kleef, M., & Jansen, P. G. (2015). The impact of career customization on work outcomes: Boundary conditions of manager support and employee age. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1998
5. Banerjee, M. (2019). Gender equality and labour force participation: Mind the gap. ANTYAJAA: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 4(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632719831827
6. Barik, P. (2020). Relationship between work-life balance policies & performance. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(4), 653–667. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27199293
7. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. R., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
8. Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078–1095. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585791
9. Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39(4), 958–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407508
10. Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Barbour, J. P. (2014). Relationships of individual and organizational support with engagement: Examining various types of causality in a three-wave study. Work & Stress, 28(3), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.934316
11. Bing, M. N., & Burroughs, S. M. (2001). The predictive and interactive effects of equity sensitivity in teamwork-oriented organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 22(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.68
12. Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
13. Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1153260
14. Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I'm tired of tryin'!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037583
15. Bowles, H. R., Thomason, B., & Bear, J. B. (2019). Reconceptualizing what and how women negotiate for career advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1645–1671. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1497
16. Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., & Santos, A. (2022). Teleworking in times of COVID-19: The role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors in workers' work-family management, exhaustion, and work engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(15), 2924–2959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2063064
17. Chanana, K. (2020). Women and leadership: Strategies of gender inclusion in institutions of higher education in India. In G. Crimmins (ed.), Strategies for supporting inclusion and diversity in the academy: Higher education, aspiration and inequality (pp. 141–162). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_8
18. Chiang, C.-F., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011
19. Cook, M. (2009). Education and professional development. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(5), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01030.x
20. Dhiman, M. C., Budhwar, P. S., & Katou, A. A. (2017). Investigating idiosyncratic deals in the Indian hospitality industry. In M. Dhiman (ed.), Opportunities and challenges for tourism and hospitality in the BRIC nations (pp. 220–238). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0708-6.ch014
21. Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2016). Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement. In Society for human resource management and society for industrial and organizational psychology. SHRM-SIOP Science of HR Series. https://www.siop.org/Portals/84/docs/SIOP-SHRM%20White%20Papers/SHRM-SIOP%20POS.pdf
22. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
23. Elias, S. M., & Mittal, R. (2011). The importance of supervisor support for a change initiative: An analysis of job satisfaction and involvement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 19(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831111173432
24. Fineman, S. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208680
25. Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040648
26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
27. Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869
28. Gandhi, M., & Sen, K. (2021). Missing women in Indian university leadership: Barriers and facilitators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896048
29. Garcia-Cabrera, A. M., Lucia-Casademunt, A. M., Cuellar-Molina, D., & Padilla-Angulo, L. (2018). Negative work-family/family-work spillover and well-being across Europe in the hospitality industry: The role of perceived supervisor support. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.01.006
30. Ghosh, S., & Kundu, A. (2021). Women's participation in higher education in India: An analysis across major states. Indian Journal of Human Development, 15(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030211030048
31. Gopalan, N., Pattusamy, M., & Gollakota, K. (2020). Role of support in work-family interface among university faculty in India. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-11-2019-0211
32. Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
33. Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
34. Grant, A. M., & Patil, S. V. (2012). Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0437
35. Greenberg, J., Roberge, M.-E., Ho, V. T., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Fairness in idiosyncratic work arrangements: Justice as an I-deal. In J. J. Martocchio (ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 1–34). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(04)23001-8
36. Guerrero, S., Bentein, K., & Lapalme, M.-E. (2014). Idiosyncratic deals and high performers' organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9316-7
37. Halbesleben, J. R., & Wheeler, A. R. (2011). I owe you one: Coworker reciprocity as a moderator of the day-level exhaustion-performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.748
38. Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Bodner, T., & Crain, T. (2013). Measurement development and validation of the family-supportive supervisor behavior short-form (FSSB-SF). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000118
39. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
40. Heras, L. M., Van der Heijden, B. I., De Jong, J., & Rofcanin, Y. (2017). “Handle with care”: The mediating role of schedule i-deals in the relationship between supervisors' own caregiving responsibilities and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12160
41. Horan, W. P., Dolinsky, M., Lee, J., Kern, R. S., Hellemann, G., Sugar, C. A., Glynn, S. M., & Green, M. F. (2018). Social cognitive skills training for psychosis with community-based training exercises: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(6), 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx167
42. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2009). Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: Antecedents and outcomes of i-deals from a managerial perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(8), 738–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910996770
43. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M. (2010). Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.625
44. Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Weigl, M., Müller, A., & Glaser, J. (2014). Redesigning work through idiosyncratic deals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.740171
45. Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2015). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102–1127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1142
46. Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794672
47. Jo, V. H. (2008). Voluntary turnover and women administrators in higher education. Higher Education, 56(5), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9111-y
48. Katou, A., Budhwar, P., & Chand, M. D. (2020). The moderating effects of transformational leadership and self-worth in the idiosyncratic deals - employee reactions relationship: A study of the Indian hospitality industry. Personnel Review, 49(7), 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2019-0088
49. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
50. Kersh, R. (2018). Women in higher education: Exploring stressful workplace factors and coping strategies. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1372295
51. Klein, K. J., Berman, L. M., & Dickson, M. W. (2000). May I work part-time? An exploration of predicted employer responses to employee requests for part-time work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1729
52. Kong, D. T., Ho, V. T., & Garg, S. (2020). Employee and coworker idiosyncratic deals: Implications for emotional exhaustion and deviant behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4033-9
53. Kossek, E. E., Ollier-Malaterre, A., Lee, M. D., Pichler, S., & Hall, D. T. (2016). Line managers' rationales for professionals' reduced-load work in embracing and ambivalent organizations. Human Resource Management, 55(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21722
54. Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M., & Rock, A.-G. (2021). From ideal workers to ideal work for all: A 50-year review integrating the careers and work-family research with a future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, Article ID 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103504
55. Lagarde, C., & Ostry, J. D. (2018, November 28). Economic gains from gender inclusion: Even greater than you thought. IMF Blog. https://blogs.imf.org/2018/11/28/economic-gains-from-gender-inclusion-even-greater-than-you-thought/
56. Lapierre, L. M., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169
57. Lee, M. D., MacDermid, S. M., & Buck, M. L. (2000). Organizational paradigms of reduced-load work: Accommodation, elaboration, and transformation. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556346
58. Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0121
59. Lendak-Kabok, K. (2022). Women's work–life balance strategies in academia. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 1139–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1802324
60. Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Meuser, J. D. (2017). Idiosyncratic deals and individual effectiveness: The moderating role of leader-member exchange differentiation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.014
61. Loeffler, D., Ely, G., & Flaherty, C. (2010). Parenting on the tenure track: Exploring gender differences in perceptions of collegial and supervisor support. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8(2), Article no. 31. https://doi.org/10.58809/NTMG2185
62. Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Rofcanin, Y. (2021). Co-worker reactions to i-deals through the lens of social comparison: The role of fairness and emotions. Human Relations, 74(3), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719884103
63. Matta, R., Kochhar, K., Mohapatra, A. K., & Mohanty, D. (2022). Board characteristics and risk disclosure quality by integrated reporters: Evidence from Indian banks. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(5), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i5/169579
64. Miner, A. S. (1987). Idiosyncratic jobs in formalized organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392908
65. Mishra, N., Rajkumar, M., & Mishra, R. (2022). Emotional intelligence as a moderator between micromanagement leadership and employee performance. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(10), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i10/172409
66. Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, (Vol. 12, pp. 39–53). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/276523
67. Mueller, J. S., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021574
68. Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Hammer, L. B., Crain, T. L., & Bodner, T. E. (2016). The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039961
69. Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
70. Ozbozkurt, O. B., Yesilkus, F., & Korkmazyurek, H. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between structural empowerment and perceived supervisor support. Journal of Transnational Management, 26(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2021.1885900
71. Penny, W. Y., & Joanne, C. S. (2013). Casino employees' perceptions of their quality of work life. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.11.010
72. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
73. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
74. Rofcanin, Y., de Jong, J. P., Heras, M. L., & Kim, S. (2018). The moderating role of prosocial motivation on the association between family-supportive supervisor behaviours and employee outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.04.001
75. Rofcanin, Y., Kiefer, T., & Strauss, K. (2017). What seals the I-deal? Exploring the role of employees' behaviours and managers' emotions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12168
76. Rounak, S., & Misra, R. K. (2022). Employee value proposition, exchange ideology, and intention to stay: A conceptual analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(8), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i8/171523
77. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). The idiosyncratic deals: Flexibility versus fairness? Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00032-8
78. Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527470
79. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
80. Safaria, T., Othman, A., & Wahab, M. N. (2012). Gender, academic rank, employment status, university type and job stress among university academic staff: A comparison between Malaysia and Indonesia context. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 250–261. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No_18_Special_Issue/28.pdf
81. Sahin, S. G., Pal, S., & Hughes, B. M. (2021). Core self-evaluations and psychological well-being: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(4), 1101–1119. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2020-0340
82. Sargent, A. C., Shanock, L. G., Banks, G. C., & Yavorsky, J. E. (2022). How gender matters: A conceptual and process model for family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), Article ID 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100880
83. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1983). Individual differences in productivity: An empirical test of estimates derived from studies of selection procedure utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.407
84. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
85. Sekhar, C., & Patwardhan, M. (2023). Flexible working arrangement and job performance: The mediating role of supervisor support. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2020-0396
86. Sharma, H., & Yadav, R. (2018). The relationship between organizational justice and work engagement: Trust as a mediator. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(3), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i3/122078
87. Shinn, M., Wong, N. W., Simko, P. A., & Ortiz-Torres, B. (1989). Promoting the well-being of working parents: Coping, social support, and flexible job schedules. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00931201
88. Simosi, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Weingart, L. R. (2021). Opening the black box of i-deals negotiation: Integrating i-deals and negotiation research. Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 186–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121995379
89. Singh, A., Parandhaman, B., & Saini, D. (2021). The leadership gender gap in HEI spaces - A conceptual framework. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(8), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i8/165677
90. Sliskovic, A., & Sersic, D. (2011). Work stress among university teachers: Gender and position differences. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 62(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-62-2011-2135
91. Ullah, M. S., Islam, M., & Ukil, M. I. (2022). Work from home during COVID-19: The role of perceived hope, intrinsic spirituality, and perceived supervisor support on job involvement. Management Matters, 19(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/MANM-12-2021-0005
92. UNESCO IESALC. (2023). Gender and higher education: Global perspective on equity and equality. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC). unesdoc.unesco.org/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_ceac3531-867e-4f81-aad8-e2bdfe9bb241? =387300eng.pdf&to=119&from=1
93. Vashisht, S., & Vashisht, R. (2020). Student to faculty incivility: Experience of faculty in higher education institutions and its consequences. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(5–7), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i5-7/153082
94. Wang, P., Wang, S., Yao, X., Hsu, I.-C., & Lawler, J. (2019). Idiosyncratic deals and work-to-family conflict and enrichment: The mediating roles of fit perceptions and efficacy beliefs. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(4), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12246
95. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
96. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
97. Xhaho, A., Caro, E., & Bailey, A. (2021). Empowerment or a double burden? Work, family, and agency among Albanian migrant women in Greece. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(10), 1431–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1817872
98. Yousaf, R., & Schmiede, R. (2017). Barriers to women's representation in academic excellence and positions of power. Asian Journal of German and European Studies, 2, Article no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40856-017-0013-6