New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Idiosyncratic Behavior of Shareholders Toward Corporate Sustainability Reports

Open Access Original Article

Idiosyncratic Behavior of Shareholders Toward Corporate Sustainability Reports

Amit Kumar Singh1,  Sandeep Kumar Goel2

1 Professor, Department of Commerce, Delhi School of Economics, University Enclave, Delhi - 110 007

2 Associate Professor , Department of Commerce, Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110 019.

Volume 16
Issue 2
Pages 8–23
Year 2023
Received: Sept. 5, 2022 Accepted: Jan. 10, 2023 Published: Feb. 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose : The present study focused on identifying the factors influencing shareholders’ perception toward corporate sustainability reports. The growing importance of climate-sensitive activities in response to global warming induced us to find out the importance of sustainability reports in the minds of shareholders.x

Methodology : Seven independent latent variables, namely message characteristics, manager characteristics, assurance and accountability, standards and ratings, intra-firm factors, corporate governance mechanisms, and challenges and risks, were undertaken in the study. Further, the perception of the shareholders measured along the parameter of importance was taken as the dependent variable. For the study, we floated a structured questionnaire, received 412 responses, and ran the analysis on SMART PLS.

Findings : We found that only four variables out of seven significantly influenced the perception of the shareholders toward corporate sustainability reports. To elaborate, message characteristics, assurance and accountability, and corporate governance mechanisms positively influenced the perception of the shareholders, while standards and ratings negatively influenced the perception of the shareholders.

Practical Implications : It was recommended that corporations must publish credible, accurate, and adequate information while inviting active participation from the shareholders. Our study is not free from limitations and allows scope for future researchers – whether differences in the perception of the shareholders arising due to various boundaries could be undertaken in future research work.

Originality : Unlike prior research on corporate social responsibility, the current work builds a model to examine shareholders’ perceptions toward corporate sustainability reports.

Keywords Corporate Sustainability Perception of Shareholders Corporate Governance Assurance and Accountability
How to Cite

Amit Kumar Singh, Sandeep Kumar Goel (2023). Idiosyncratic Behavior of Shareholders Toward Corporate Sustainability Reports. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(2), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i2/172728

References
  1. Adrian, C., & Wright, S. (2020). Perception of shareholders and directors on corporate governance: What we learn about director primacy. Accounting and Finance, 60(S1), 1209–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12418
  2. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 279 – 288. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294968
  3. Ballou, B., Heitger, D. L., & Landes, C. E. (2006). The future of corporate sustainability reporting: A rapidly growing assurance opportunity. Journal of Accountancy, 200(6), 65 – 74.
  4. Behal, V., & Gupta, M. (2022). Reporting of corporate social responsibility practices: An evidence from Indian BSE-listed companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i3/165633
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  6. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26, 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  7. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
  8. Cullinan, C., Mahoney, L. S., & Roush, P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder support for corporate governance changes. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2015-0161
  9. Epstein, M. J., & Freedman, M. (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579410069867
  10. Fakhari H., Malekian E., & Jafaei Rahni, M. (2018). Explaining and ranking of the components and indicators of environmental, social and corporate governance reporting by analytic hierarchy process in the companies listed in stock exchange. Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.2.4.153
  11. Fifka, M., & Drabble, M. (2012). Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting – A comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(7), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1730
  12. Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00058-1
  13. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159168
  14. Gorski, H., Fuciu, M., & Dumitrescu, L.(2017). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Essential topics for business education. Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, 2(1), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/cplbu-2017-0054
  15. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872
  16. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2007). Corporate sustainability: Accountability and the pursuit of the impossible dream. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer (eds.), Handbook of sustainable development. Cheltenham.
  17. Guidry, R., & Patten, D. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021011059214
  18. Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educational International.
  19. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
  20. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.196
  21. Mercer, M. (2004). How do investors assess the credibility of management disclosures? Accounting Horizons, 18(3), 185 – 196. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2004.18.3.185
  22. Naser, K. (1999). Empirical evidence on corporate social responsibility reporting and accountability in developing countries: The case of Jordan. Advances in International Accounting, 12, 93–226.
  23. Patro, B., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2017). Corporate governance as a moderating variable for identifying the relationship between CSR and earnings management: A study of listed Indian mining firms. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(10), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i10/118812
  24. Pei-yi Yu, E., Tanda, A., & Chai, B. V. (2021). Environmental transparency and investors’ risk perception: Cross-country evidence on multinational corporations’ sustainability practices and cost of equity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3975–4000. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2852
  25. Rosenthal, P. I. (1971). Specificity, verifiability, and message credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57(4), 393 – 401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383084
  26. Schreuder, H. (1981). Employees and the corporate social report: The Dutch case. The Accounting Review, 6(2), 294 – 308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/245814
  27. Sethi, P., Gupta, L., & Jain, S. (2021). A study of student perception towards stock market in India: A SEM based approach. Gurugram University Business Review, 1(2), 60–68.
  28. Sethi, P., Gupta, L., & Jain, S. (2022). The anomaly of surging primary investor footprints during the pandemic. Saaransh: RKG Journal of Management, 14(1), 41–47.
  29. Simoni, L., Bini, L., & Bellucci, M. (2020). Effects of social, environmental, and institutional factors on sustainability report assurance: Evidence from European countries. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(6), 1059 – 1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2019-0462
  30. Singh, A. K., & Jain, S. (2020). Foreign direct investment and initial public offerings: Exploring the roads less travelled. FIIB Business Review, 9(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520973849
  31. Singh, A., & Verma, P. (2017). Investigating the nexus of corporate social responsibility and brand equity: A systematic review. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i2/110625
  32. Toms, J. S. (2002). Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. The British Accounting Review, 34(3), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2002.0211
  33. Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O’Dwyer, B. (2007). Introduction to sustainability accounting and accountability. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 1 – 16). Routledge.
  34. Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). ‘Too good to be true!’. The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl 2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9731-2
  35. Xiao, X., & Shailer, G. (2021). Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports. The British Accounting Review, 54(1), 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101002
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines