New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure Quality by Integrated Reporters : Evidence from Indian Banks

Open Access Original Article

Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure Quality by Integrated Reporters : Evidence from Indian Banks

Rahul Matta1,  Khyati Kochhar2,  Amiya Kumar Mohapatra3,  Debasis Mohanty4

1 Research Scholar, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan

2 Assistant Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan

3 Deputy Director, FOSTIIMA Business School, New Delhi - 110 077

4 Assistant Professor, School of Commerce Management and Research, ITM University, Raipur - 492 001, Chhattisgarh

Volume 15
Issue 5
Pages 27–42
Year 2022
Received: Sept. 15, 2021 Accepted: April 28, 2022 Published: May 1, 2022
Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the influence of board characteristics on the quality of risk disclosures in integrated annual reports of banks in India. Integrated reports support organizations in controlling risks, identifying opportunities, connecting risks with business policies, developing business models, and contributing to the value creation process. In February 2017, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) recommended the adoption of an integrated reporting (IR) framework by the top 500 companies in India on a voluntary basis from 2017–18. Considering the relevance of integrated reporting and its underlying benefits to various stakeholders, banks have primarily adopted the IR framework and started publishing their annual reports in line with the IR principles. Using content analysis on the sample of 30 banks listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India, the efficacy of risk disclosures, the outlook orientation (past, present, and future), approaches to risk (positive, neutral, and negative) were investigated, and the influence of attributes of board of directors on the quality of risk disclosure was examined. On examining 4,183 sentences concerning risk disclosures by Indian banks, the results showed a positive relationship between board size, diversity, independence, meetings, and education background in accounting/finance with risk disclosure quality (RDQ). Also, it was found that integrated reporters tended to disclose more risks and suggested ways to mitigate those risks compared to non-adopters.

Keywords risk disclosure agency theory integrated reporting corporate governance disclosure quality
How to Cite

Rahul Matta, Khyati Kochhar, Amiya Kumar Mohapatra, Debasis Mohanty (2022). Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure Quality by Integrated Reporters : Evidence from Indian Banks. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(5), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i5/169579

References
  1. Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analyzing the determinants of narrative risk information in UKFTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.06.002
  2. Abraham, S., & Shrives, P. J. (2014). Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.002
  3. Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1),187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3
  4. Al-Maghzom, A., Hussainey, K., & Aly, D. (2016). Corporate governance and risk disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2p14
  5. Al-Hadi, A., Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Hussain, S. M., & Taylor, G. (2019). Market risk disclosures and corporate governance structure: Evidence from GCC financial firms. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 73, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.11.008
  6. Anderson, D. R., & Anderson, K. E. (2009). Sustainability risk management. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 12(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2009.01152.x
  7. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x
  8. Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006
  9. Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2011). Women on boards in Italy. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945855
  10. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002
  11. Cole, C. J., & Jones, C. L. (2004). The usefulness of MD&A disclosures in the retail industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900401
  12. Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
  13. De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x
  14. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506
  15. Donnelly, R., & Mulcahy, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00692.x
  16. Elghaffar, E. S., Abotalib, A. M., & Mohamed Khalil, M. A. (2019). Determining factors that affect risk disclosure level in Egyptian banks. Banks & Bank Systems, 14(1), 159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.14
  17. Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: Evidence from UK FTSE all-share companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.010
  18. Elshandidy, T., & Neri, L. (2015). Corporate governance, risk disclosure practices, and market liquidity: Comparative evidence from the UK and Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(4), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12095
  19. Enslin, Z., Bruwer, W., & Viljoen, C. (2015). Enhancing risk-related disclosure in South Africa: A study on guidelines and current practices. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v8i1.94
  20. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/725104
  21. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1294
  22. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987
  23. Hariharan, B. R., Sailaja, V. N., & Patel, K. (2017). A study of disclosures on risk management of life insurance companies in India. Indian Journal of Finance,11(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i1/108959
  24. IIRC.(2013).International<IR>framework. http://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework
  25. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Advances in Strategic Management, 8(3), 345–382.
  26. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
  27. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  28. Jorion, P. (2002). How informative are value-at-risk disclosures? The Accounting Review, 77(4), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.911
  29. Kajüter, P. (2006). Risk disclosures of listed firms in Germany: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the 10th Financial Reporting & Business Communication Conference, July, Cardiff Business School.
  30. Kakkar, D., & Kamboj, G. (2011). Board structure and corporate performance: A causal analysis of select Indian companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 4(11), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2011/v4i11/62647
  31. Kravet, T., & Muslu, V. (2013). Textual risk disclosures and investors' risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4), 1088–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-013-9228-9
  32. Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2005). A content analysis of risk management disclosure in Canadian annual reports. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2005.tb00714.x
  33. Lamboglia, R., Paolone, F., & Mancini, D. (2019). Determinants of the implementation of environmental risk indicators: Empirical evidence from the Italian manufacturing context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1680
  34. Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosure in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2006.05.002
  35. Linsmeier, T. J., Thornton, D. B., Venkatachalam, M., & Welker, M. (2002). The effect of mandated market risk disclosures on trading volume sensitivity to interest rate, exchange rate, and commodity price movements. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.343
  36. Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolo, G., & Levy Orelli, R. (2017). Reshaping risk disclosure through integrated reporting: Evidence from Italian early adopters. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(10), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n10p11
  37. Marshall, A., & Weetman, P. (2007). Modelling transparency in disclosure: The case of foreign exchange risk management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(5–6), 705–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02007.x
  38. Matta, R., & Mohapatra, A. K. (2021). Do content elements and capitals of integrated reporting framework require rethinking amid COVID-19? Empirical Economics Letters, 20, (July Special Issue 1), 13–25. http://www.eel.my100megs.com/2021-7-july-si-1-abstract-p2.pdf
  39. McNally, M.-A., Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2017). Exploring the challenges of preparing an integrated report. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2016-0085
  40. Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270138
  41. Mohapatra, A. K., & Jha, S. (2018). Bank recapitalization in India: A critique of public policy concerns. FIIB Business Review, 7(1), 10–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2319714518766113
  42. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors' contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27
  43. Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2011). Voluntary risk reporting to enhance institutional and organizational legitimacy: Evidence from Portuguese banks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 19(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581981111147892
  44. Pavlopoulos, A., Magnis, C., & Iatridis, G. E. (2019). Integrated reporting: An accounting disclosure tool for high quality financial reporting. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.007
  45. Raar, J. (2002). Environmental initiatives: Towards triple bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436781
  46. Rajpurohit, P. D., & Rijwani, P. R. (2020). Financial reporting practices and internal corporate governance mechanisms in emerging markets. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(8–9), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i8-9/155230
  47. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1997.9709231661
  48. Sarpal, S. (2015). Antecedents of corporate board independence in simultaneous equation framework: Evidence from India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management,8(9), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2015/v8i9/77191
  49. Singh, A. K., Maurya, S., & Mohapatra, A. (2019). IPO underpricing and predictive power of board related corporate governance mechanisms: A study of Indian IPO market. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(6), 2002–2018. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.96127
  50. Solomon, J. F., Solomon, A., Norton, S. D., & Joseph, N. L. (2011). Private climate change reporting: An emerging discourse of risk and opportunity? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(8), 1119–1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111184788
  51. Steyn, M. (2014). Organisational benefits and implementation challenges of mandatory integrated reporting: Perspectives of senior executives at South African listed companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(4), 476503. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2013-0052
  52. Tonk, M. S. (2012). Independent directors: An Indian perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 5(4), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2012/v5i4/60328
  53. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
  54. Van Zijl, W., Wöstmann, C., & Maroun, W. (2017). Strategy disclosures by listed financial services companies: Signalling theory, legitimacy theory and South African integrated reporting practices. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(3), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i3.37
  55. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2),1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1879
  56. Watson, A., Shrives, P., & Marston, C. (2002). Voluntary disclosure of accounting ratios in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 34(4), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2002.0213
  57. Welford, R. (2000). Corporate environmental management 3: Towards sustainable development (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825106
  58. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In, B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). JAI Wilson.
  59. Wong, A. (2014). Corporate sustainability through non-financial risk management. Corporate Governance, 14(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2013-0026
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines