The objective of the article was to show how the diversity of the planet seems to get blurred due to the ongoing process of homogenization of flora and fauna on Earth. This was done by exploring the literature that provides a link between a globalized world and biological invasion. Though the literature on the subject is rather limited, but provides some insightful details into the matter. The article succeeded in showing that some of the innate tendencies of human behavior have actually made the problem of invasion worse. What remains to be investigated is the outcome of this continuous process of homogenization, whether it would lead to a complete destruction of diversity that the planet is known for, or whether the system would settle on a different equilibrium, where the term "native" would no longer hold relevance.

1. Eiswerth, M. E., & Johnson,W. S. (2002). Managing nonindigenous invasive species: Insights from dynamic analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23 (3), 319 - 342. DOI : 10.1023/A:1021275607224
2. Hattingh, J. P. (2001). Human dimensions of invasive alien species in philosophical perspective: Towards an ethic of conceptual responsibility. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 183-194). Cambridge : IUCN.
3. Hulme, P. E. (2009). Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46 (1), 10 - 18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x
4. Jenkins, P.T. (2001).Who should pay? Economic dimensions of preventing harmfulinvasions through international trade and travel. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 79-88). Cambridge : IUCN.
5. Low, T. (2001). From ecology to politics: The human side of alien invasions. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 35-42). Cambridge : IUCN.
6. Mack, R. N. (2001) Motivations and consequences of the human dispersal of plants. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 23-34). Cambridge : IUCN.
7. McGarry, D., Shackleton, C.M., Fourie, S., Gambiza, J., Shackleton, S.E. & Fabricius, C.F. (2005). A rapid assessment of the effects of invasive species on human livelihoods, especially of the rural poor. Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
8. McGeoch, M. A., Chown, S. L., & Kalwij, J. M. (2006). A global indicator for biological invasion. Conservation Biology, 20 (6), 1635–1646. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00579.x
9. McNeely, J. A. (Ed.) (2001). The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species. Cambridge : IUCN.
10. Meyerson, L. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5 (4), Ecology in an Era of Globalization, 199-208.
11. Rodriguez, L. F. (2006).Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biological Invasions, 8 (4), 927 - 939. DOI : 10.1007/s10530-005-5103-3
12. Staples, G. W. (2001) The understory of human dimensions in biological invasions. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 171-182). Cambridge : IUCN.
13. Vilà , M., & Pujadas, J. (2001). Socio-economic parameters influencing plant invasions in Europe and North Africa. In J. A. McNeely (Ed.), The great reshuffling: Human dimensions of invasive alien species (pp. 75-78). Cambridge : IUCN.