Purpose : The present study investigated the relationship between brand experiences, hedonic values, utilitarian values, user engagement, continuous intention, and word of mouth (WOM) in the educational technology (EdTech) sector. It aimed to understand how brand experience influenced customer value and engagement, ultimately driving brand loyalty and positive WOM.

Methodology : The study was conducted among working professionals from Northern India, including teachers, researchers, IT professionals, managers, and consultants focused on skill development. Using convenience and snowball sampling, 1,162 valid responses were collected, ensuring participants had prior experience and completed at least one course on an Edtech platform. Data analysis was performed using Smart PLS software.

Findings : The results indicated that the dimensions of affective, behavioral, and intellectual brand experience enhanced hedonic and utilitarian values. A strong correlation was found between customer value and engagement. The study also corroborated the positive influence of engaged customers on continuous intention to use EdTech platforms and share positive WOM.

Practical Implications : This study provided EdTech firms insights into enhancing customer retention and advocacy strategies. Strengthening brand experiences, enhancing customer value, and driving engagement can lead to greater brand loyalty and positive WOM, contributing to competitive advantage in the industry.

Originality : By expanding existing research on brand experience in the EdTech sector, this study offered practical recommendations for improving user engagement and retention. It contributed to a deeper understanding of how brand experiences shaped customer perceptions and behaviors, providing valuable implications for EdTech platforms.

1. Ahn, J., & Back, K.-J. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of customer brand engagement in integrated resorts. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.05.020
2. Alam, S. S., Masukujjaman, M., Ahmad, M., & Jaffor, R. (2023). Acceptance of online distance learning (ODL) among students: Mediating role of utilitarian and hedonic value. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8503–8536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11533-3
3. Alvi, I. (2024). Gamification in education management: Fulfilling students’ intrinsic needs and enhancing learning outcomes. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(11), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i11/174022
4. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1 994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
5. Bae, J.-H., & Jeon, H.-M. (2022). Exploring the relationships among brand experience, perceived product quality, hedonic value, utilitarian value, and brand loyalty in unmanned coffee shops during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(18), 11713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811713
6. Bloemer, J., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (1999). Linking perceived service quality and service loyalty: A multi-dimensional perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1082–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910292285
7. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 151, Article ID 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
8. Brakus, J. J., Schmitt, B. H., & Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand Experience: What is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.052
9. Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2023). The impact of gamified loyalty programmes on customer engagement behaviours. A hotel industry application. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(5), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-02-2022-0033
10. Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, key propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703
11. Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
12. Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (eds.), Handbook of partial least squares. Springer handbooks of computational statistics (pp. 655–690). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
13. Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. Happer and Row Publisher. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1950-00647-000
14. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, Article ID 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
15. Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis : Methods and applications (p. 587). Wiley. https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000081114
16. Ding, C. G., & Tseng, T. H. (2015). On the relationships among brand experience, hedonic emotions, and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 994–1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2013-0200
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
18. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. https://www.amazon.in/Multivariate-Data-Analysis-Joseph-Hair/dp/0138132631
19. Hair Jr., J. F., Page, M. I., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374
20. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2297757
21. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
22. Harrigan, P., Evers, U., Miles, M., & Daly, T. (2017). Customer engagement with tourism social media brands. Tourism Management, 59, 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.015
23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
24. Hollebeek, L. D. (2013). The Customer Engagement/Value Interface: An exploratory investigation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.006
25. Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
26. Hussein, A. S. (2018). Effects of brand experience on brand loyalty in Indonesian casual dining restaurant: Roles of customer satisfaction and brand of origin. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 24(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.24.1.4
27. Kanojia, M., Shukla, B., & Wali, A. (2022). Critical factors to technology development in Indian academia : An ISM-MICMAC approach. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(5), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i5/169578
28. Kapoor, M., & Joshi, R. M. (2024). Impact of trade show marketing activities on customer engagement : A B2B perspective. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(8), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i8/174184
29. Kaur, S., Yadav, B., Goel, D., Devi, S., Ramachandaran, S. D., & Kumar, A. (2024). Exploring Indian students' perception, behavioral intentions, and motivation for learning with ChatGPT. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(12), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i12/174055
30. Kowitlawakul, Y., Tan, J. J., Suebnukarn, S., Nguyen, H. D., Poo, D. C., Chai, J., Wang, W., & Devi, K. (2022). Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students' engagement and motivation: A scoping review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 42, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.015
31. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141(S), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
32. Mäkiniemi, J.-P. (2022). Digitalisation and work well-being: A qualitative study of techno-work engagement experiences related to the use of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0276
33. Manimalar, R., & Sudha, S. (2016). Corporate ethical and legal responsibility: Effects of CSR on consumer trust and brand loyalty. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(6), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i6/94957
34. Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2003). Firms reap what they sow: The effects of shared values and perceived organisational justice on customers' evaluations of complaint handling. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.46.18591
35. Miryam, N., & Antonio, F. (2022). The effect of social media content on customer engagement and its impact on customer intention. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 16(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.16.2.115-125
36. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw-Hill. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2345970
37. O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801
38. Overby, J. W., & Lee, E.-J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10–11), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008
39. Rahi, S., Ghani, M. A., Alnaser, F. M., & Ngah, A. H. (2018). Investigating the role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, 8, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.1.001
40. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449
41. Risitano, M., Romano, R., Sorrentino, A., & Quintano, M. (2017). The impact of consumer-brand engagement on brand experience and behavioural intentions: An Italian empirical study. British Food Journal, 119(8), 1884–1896. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0579
42. Ryu, K., Han, H., & Jang, S. (2010). Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the fast-casual restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(3), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111011035981
43. Santoso, S. (2021). Factors influencing the formation of consumer engagement and consumer satisfaction with e-learning activities. Innovative Marketing, 17(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.13
44. Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1–3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496
45. Silva, S. C., De Cicco, R., Levi, M., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2023). Value creation in gamified chatbot interactions and its impact on brand engagement. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. Law, E. Luger, M. Goodwin, P. B. Brandtzaeg (eds.), Chatbot research and design. Conversations 2022 (Vol. 13815, pp. 50–65). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_4
46. Singh, N., & Nigam, S. (2021). Value-based segmentation of Generation Z women consumers of India : Replication and validation of model. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(10), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i10/166641
47. Singh, N., Panigrahi, R., & Shekhar, R. (2024). Fostering digital engagement and customer retention in Indian insurance : An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(7), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i7/174017
48. Tseng, F.-C., Liu, P.-H., Cheng, T. C., & Teng, C.-I. (2024). Using online English learning resources: Utilitarian and hedonic perspectives. Online Information Review, 48(1), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2022-0157
49. Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), Article no. 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
50. Vashisht, S., & Vashisht, R. (2020). Student to faculty incivility : Experience of faculty in higher education institutions and its consequences. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(5–7), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i5-7/153082
51. Vayghan, S., Baloglu, D., & Baloglu, S. (2023). The impact of utilitarian, social and hedonic values on hotel booking mobile app engagement and loyalty: A comparison of generational cohorts. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(5), 1990–2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-06-2022-0229
52. Xie, L., Poon, P., & Zhang, W. (2017). Brand experience and customer citizenship behavior: The role of brand relationship quality. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2016-1726
53. Zarantonello, L., & Schmitt, B. H. (2010). Using the brand experience scale to profile consumers and predict consumer behaviour. Journal of Brand Management, 17(7), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2010.4
54. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
55. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000203