New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Accreditation Compulsion or Inducement : A Perception Study of Various Stakeholders

Open Access Original Article

Accreditation Compulsion or Inducement : A Perception Study of Various Stakeholders

Teena Bagga1

1 Professor, Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh

Volume 10
Issue 12
Pages 7–19
Year 2017
Received: April 14, 2017 Accepted: Nov. 25, 2017 Published: Dec. 1, 2017
Abstract

This century has seen tremendous changes in higher-education institutions across the globe. The Indian education system too is witnessing a change in terms of privatization of education. Till the 1980s, the government was heavily funding these institutions because the focus then was to support the increasing demand of higher education. However, the mushrooming of private HEIs in India led the Govt. to stop the financial aid beyond the 1980s. A new National Policy on Education was drafted in 1986, and accordingly, many acts of the Parliament were passed in the following years to enforce quality assurance in higher education. Among the measures identified to ensure assurance of higher educational quality, accreditation was one. However, even after years of its existence through national accreditation agencies like NBA and NAAC since 1994, a majority of the HEIs still continue to exist and operate without an accreditation, along with a general understanding that there is a low level of awareness or understanding among the various stakeholders of higher education about the concept of 'accreditation'. The current research thus focused on ascertaining the actual figures and insights about the awareness of accreditation as well as the various perceptions which these different stakeholders held about accreditation.

Keywords Quality Academic Quality AACSB AMBA EQUIS IACBE NBA NAAC Higher Education Accreditation
How to Cite

Teena Bagga (2017). Accreditation Compulsion or Inducement : A Perception Study of Various Stakeholders. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977

References
  1. Andrews, B.K., Roller, R.A., & Bovee, S.L. (2003). Specialized accreditation of business schools: A comparison of alternative costs, benefits, and motivations. Journal of Education for Business, 78 (4), 197 - 204.
  2. Bagga, T., Bansal, S., Kumar, P., & Jain, S. (2016). New wave of accreditation in Indian higher education: Comparison of accreditation bodies for management programmes. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(8), 26 - 40. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i8/99778
  3. Ball, C., & Urwin, D. (1985). Fitness for purpose: Essays in higher education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education & NFER-Nelson.
  4. Barnett, R. (1994). Power, enlightenment and quality evaluation. European Journal of Education, 29 (2), 165 - 179.
  5. Friend - Pereira, J. C., Lutz, K., & Heerens, N. (2002). European student handbook on quality assurance in higher education. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.esib.org/projects/qap/QAhandbook/ QAhandbook.doc target="_blank">http://www.esib.org/projects/qap/QAhandbook/ QAhandbook.doc</a>
  6. Fuinlong, C. (2000). The use of quality assurance models in Thai colleges and universities (Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
  7. Giertz, B. (2001, May). Anything goes? The concept of quality revisited. Paper presented at the 6th Quality in Higher Education Seminar, Birmingham, England.
  8. Harvey, L. (2004). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26 (2), 207 - 223.
  9. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9 - 34.
  10. Julian, S. D., & Ofori - Dankwa, J. C. (2006). Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5 (2), 225 - 233.
  11. Lejeune, C. (2011). Is continuous improvement through accreditation sustainable? Management Decision, 49(9),1535 - 1548.
  12. Lejeune, C., & Vas, A. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness in business schools: A test of the accreditation impact. Journal of Management Development, 28 (8), 728 - 741.
  13. Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1649 - 1665.
  14. Orlans, H. (2002). The end of monopoly. Change, 32 (2), 61 - 80.
  15. Prøitz, T. S., Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2004). Accreditation, standards and diversity: An analysis of EQUIS accreditation reports. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (6), 735 -750.
  16. Romero, E.J. (2008). AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245 - 255.
  17. Sanyal, B. C., & Martin, M. (2007). Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: An overview. Report: Higher Education in the World 2007: Accreditation for Quality Assurance: What is at Stake? Retrieved from <a href=http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099/8095 target="_blank">http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099/8095</a>
  18. Selden, W.K. (1960). Why accreditation? The Journal of Higher Education, 31 (6), 296 - 301.
  19. Stensaker, B. (2003). Trance, transparency and transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 9, 151 - 159.
  20. Thrash, P.A. (1979). Accreditation: A perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 50 (2), 115 - 120.
  21. Young, K. E. (1983). Understanding accreditation: Contemporary perspectives on issues and practices in evaluating educational quality. California : Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  22. Zook, G.F., & Haggerty, M.E. (1936). Principles of accrediting higher education institutions. In, The evaluation of higher education institutions (Vol. I, p. 18). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines