Deprivation as a Causal Factor for Child Labour:A Case Study from Sikkim

Authors

  •   Anamika Bansal M.Phil Scholar, Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i3/95420

Keywords:

Child Labour

, Poverty, Capability Deprivation, Deprivation Index

I24

, I31, J71

Paper Submission Date

, November 25, 2015, Paper sent back for Revision, March 29, 2016, Paper Acceptance Date, May 9, 2016.

Abstract

Poverty is well recognized as an important supply side factor on the child labour issue. The paper explored this relationship in a situation where a household is compelled to send their children to work because of the concern of the parents for household survival. Instead of measuring poverty in a traditional way, which is exclusively interpreted in monetary terms, this study explained the link between child labour and poverty in a more expanded and meaningful way in the form of deprivation. With a particular empirical focus on Sikkim, which is one of the most neglected and untouched areas with regard to child labour research in spite of being ranked first in terms of work participation rate of children in 2001 Census, the paper tried to answer the question of whether the attainment of basic capabilities reduces child labour. With this purpose in mind, poverty was measured in a multi-dimensional approach, where a human deprivation index was constructed on the basis of the lack of basic infrastructural facilities in three respects, that is, education, health, and standard of living. In the latter part of the paper, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used as a measure of the degree of association between deprivation and child labour hours. As expected, child labour is treated as an increasing function of human deprivation. The study also showed the intensity of child labourers across different income classes in Sikkim by using the goodness of fit test. In case of the low income classes, the number of children in the labour force is likely to be higher up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

Bansal, A. (2016). Deprivation as a Causal Factor for Child Labour:A Case Study from Sikkim. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research, 5(3), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i3/95420

Issue

Section

Health, Education & Welfare Economics

References

Basu, K., & Van, P. H. (1998). The economics of child labour. The American Economic Review , 88 (3), 412-427.

Bhalotra, S., & Heady, C. (2003). Child farm labor : The wealth paradox. The World Bank Economic Review , 17 (2), 197-227. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhg017

Chakraborty, S. (2013). Tea, tragedy and child trafficking in the Terai Dooars. Economic and Political Weekly , 48(39), 17-19.

Ghosh, B. (2013). Child trafficking in the tea gardens of Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. In A.K. Singh, S.P. Singh, & S.K. Biswas, Gender violence in India - Perspectives, issues and way forward (pp. 250-262). New Delhi : Bal Vikas Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.

Grootaert, C., & Kanbur, R. (1995). Child labour : An economic perspective. International Labour Review , 134 (2), 187-203.

Holzmann, R., & Jørgensen, S. (2000). Social risk management: A new conceptual framework for Social Protection, and beyond (Social Protection Discussion Paper No.0006). Washington, D.C. : The World Bank, Human Development Network, Social Protection Unit.

International Labour Organization. (n.d.). What is child labour. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/lang--en/index.htm

Jayaraj, D., & Subramanian, S. (2002). Child Labour in Tamil Nadu in the 1980s: A preliminary account of its nature, extent and distribution. Economic and Political Weekly, 37 (10), 941-954. DOI: 10.2307/4411844

Jayaraj, D., & Subramanian, S. (2007). Out of school and (probably) in work: Child labour and capability deprivation in India. Journal of South Asian Development , 2 (2), 177-226. doi: 10.1177/097317410700200202

Majumdar, M. (2001). Child labour as a human security problem: Evidence from India. Oxford Development Studies , 29 (3), 279-304. doi: 10.1080/13600810120088877

Ministry of Labour and Employment. (2013). The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill. New Delhi : Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi.

Nambissan, G. B. (2003). Educational deprivation and primary school provision: A study of providers in the city of Calcutta (Working Paper No. 187). Brighton, England : Institute of Development Studies.

Ray, R. (2000). Child labor, child schooling, and their interaction with adult labor: Empirical evidence for Peru and Pakistan. The World Bank Economic Review , 14 (2), 347-367.

Sakellariou, C., & Lall, A. (2000). Child labour in the Philippines: Determinants and Effects. Asian Economic Journal , 14 (3), 233-253. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8381.00110

Santos, M. E., & Alkire, S. (2011). Training material for producing national human development reports. MPI: Construction and analysis. Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.

State wise details of working children in the age group of 5-14 years as per Census 2001 and Census 2011 are as under. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/Census-2001&2011.pdf

Swain, S. C. (2008). Nutritional deprivation of children in Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly , 43 (37), 49-55.

United Nations Children's Emergency Fund. (2005). Child labour today. London: UNICEF.

United Nations Children's Emergency Fund. (2013). State of the world's children. New York : UNICEF.

Venkatanarayana, M. (2004). Educational deprivation of children in Andhra Pradesh, levels and trends (Working Paper No. 362). Trivandrum, Kerala : Centre for Development Studies.

Venkatanarayana, M. (2005). On the non-random distribution of educational deprivation of children in India (Working Paper No. 372). Trivandrum, Kerala : Centre for Development Studies.