Impact Analysis of SHGs in the Urban Milieu: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2014/v3i1/55916Keywords:
Self-Help Groups
, Microfinance, Poverty, Socioeconomic Impact, Women's Empowerment, Below Poverty Line, Above Poverty Line, SJSRYC21
, G20, G21Paper Submission Date
, September 1, 2013, Paper sent back for Revision, November 4, Paper Acceptance Date, December 25, 2013.Abstract
Self-Help Groups (SHGs) are considered important delivery channels for providing group loans under various poverty alleviation programmes by the government and for spreading various awareness programmes by the non-governmental bodies such as NGOs. In India, the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) piloted a microfinance programme in the mid-eighties using self-help groups to alleviate rural poverty. This initiative snowballed into a movement, and the government, non-governmental bodies, and microfinance institutions started using self-help groups for implementing various programmes for the poor. Microfinance is generally perceived as a rural phenomenon in India. This study attempts to examine the socioeconomic impact of microfinancial activities of self-help groups on their members in an urban area - Thane city in Maharashtra. The study uses sample survey data of 340 women respondents belonging to self-help groups supported by the Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC), NGOs, and non-affiliated self-help groups. It indicates that microfinancial activities of self-help groups in the urban milieu lead to desirable socioeconomic impact on members. Findings of this study may have implications for agents in the area of microfinance - the Government, the NGOs, microfinance institutions, banks, consumer goods making companies, and members of the self-help groups.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Ackerly, B.A. (1995). Testing the tools of development: Credit programmes, loan involvement, and women's empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 26 (3), 56-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1995.mp26003007.x
Arun, T., Imai, K. & Sinha, F. (2006). Does the microfinance reduce poverty in India? Propensity score matching based on a national level household data. Economics Discussion Paper (EDP-0625), University of Manchester.
Coleman, B.E. (1999). The impact of group lending in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Development Economics, 60 (1), 105-41.
Dunford, C. (2006). Building better lives: Sustainable integration of microfinance and education in child survival, reproductive health, HIV/AIDS prevention for the poorest entrepreneurs. In S. Daley Harris (Ed.) Pathways out of poverty: Innovations in microfinance for the poorest families. Virginia, U.S.A.:Kumarian Press.
Goetz, A.M., & Sen Gupta, R. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24 (1), 45-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00124-U.
Hashemi, S. M., Schuler, S.R., & Riley, A. P. (1996). Rural credit programs and women's empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development 24 (4), 635-653.
Hossain, M. (1988). Credit for alleviation of rural poverty: The Grameen bank in Bangladesh, (IFPRI Research Report, 65). Washington, D.C. : International Food Policy Research Institute, Retrieved from http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pubs/abstract/65/rr65.pdf.
Kabeer, N. (2000). The power to choose: Bangladesh women and labour market decisions in London and Dhaka. London: Verso.
Kabeer, N. (2005). Is microfinance a 'magic bullet' for women's empowerment? Economic and Political Weekly, 40 (44-45), 4709-4718.
Mayoux, L. (2001). Tackling the downside: Social capital, women's empowerment and micro finance in Cameroon. Development and Change, 32 (3), 435-464.
MkNelly, B., & Stack, K. E. (1999). Loan-size growth and sustainability in village banking programs. Small Enterprise Development, 9 (2), 4-16.
Otero, M. (1989). Breaking through - The expansion of micro-enterprise programs as a challenge for non-profit institutions. Cambridge, MA: ACCION International. Retrieved on from http://www.centerforfinancialinclusion.org/publications-a-resources/browse-publications/86.
Pitt, M. M., & Khandker, S. R. (1996). Household and intrahousehold impact of the Grameen bank and similar targeted credit programs in Bangladesh. Discussion Paper 320. World Bank : Washington, D.C.
Pitt, M. M., & Khandker, S. R. (1998). The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106 (5), 958-996.
Puhazhendhi, V., & Badataya, K. C. (2002). SHG-bank linkage programme for rural poor - an impact assessment. Paper presented at the Seminar on SHG-bank Linkage Programme, New Delhi, November, 25-26. Retrieved from http://oldsite.nabard.org/pdf/publications/sudy_reports/puhazhendi.pdf.
Rahman, A. (1988). Alleviation of rural poverty: Replicability of the Grameen bank model. South Asia Journal, 1 (4), 475-486.
Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S.M., & Riley, A. P. (1997). The influence of women's changing roles and status in Bangladesh's fertility transition: Evidence from a study of credit programs and contraceptive use. World Development, 25 (4), 563-575. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00119-2.
Sinha, F. (2010). State of microfinance in India. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?q=sinha+2010+microfinance&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ei=yup4UoyyC8zQrAeO7YGgDw&ved=0CCYQgQMwAA.
Srinivasan, N. (2009). Microfinance in India: State of the sector report 2008. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.