Impact of Agglomeration Economies on Productivity of Pharmaceutical Firms of Himachal Pradesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2019/v8i6/150841Keywords:
Agglomeration Economies
, Total Factor Productivity, Pharmaceutical Firms, Himachal Pradesh.Paper Submission Date
, November 18, 2019, Paper Sent Back for Revision, November 25, Paper Acceptance Date, December 1, 2019.Abstract
This paper used Levinsohn and Petrin's methodology to assess the productivity performance of the pharmaceutical manufacturing firms of the state of Himachal Pradesh over the period from 2001-2002 to 2015-2016. Further, a fixed effects approach has been brought into use to determine the impact of various agglomeration variables on the total factor productivity of Himachal Pradesh's pharmaceutical manufacturing firms. The total factor productivity of Himachal Pradesh’s pharmaceutical firms showed an unsteady performance over the period under study. It was observed that while urbanization has helped increase the productivity of pharmaceutical firms of the State, after a certain level, diseconomies arising from increasing urbanization tend to affect the productivity of firms adversely. Although intraindustry localization tended to impact productivity of the firms negatively, the concentration of a variety of industries affected the productivity of the firms positively.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Agarwalla, A. (2011). Agglomeration economies and productivity growth in India (Working Paper No. 2011-01-08). Ahmedabad : Indian Institute of Management.
Carlino, G. A. (1979). Increasing returns to scale in metropolitan manufacturing. Journal of Regional Science, 19(3), 363-372.
Chakravorty, S., & Lall, S. V. (2006). Made in India : The economic geography and political economy of industrialization. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
Damijan, J. P., & Konings, J. (2011). Agglomeration economies, globalization and productivity : Firm level evidence for Slovenia (Working Paper). Slovenia : VIVES Research Centre for Regional Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business.
Hulten, C.R., Bennathan, E., & Srinivasan, S. (2006). Infrastructure, externalities, and economic development: A study of the Indian manufacturing industry. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(2), 291-308.
India Brand Equity Foundation. (2010). Himachal Pradesh : IBEF Report. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/download/Himachal_Pradesh_060710.pdf
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York, NY : Random House.
Kamiike, A., Sato, T., & Aggarwal, A. (2012). Productivity dynamics in the Indian pharmaceutical industry : Evidence from plant-level panel data. Science, Technology and Society, 17(3), 431-452.
Lall, S. V., Shalizi, Z., & Deichmann, U. (2004). Agglomeration economies and productivity in Indian industry. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2), 643-673.
Lall, S. V., & Chakravorty, S. (2005). Industrial location and spatial inequality : Theory and evidence from India. Review of Development Economics, 9 (1), 47-68.
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317-341.
Mitra, A. (2000). Total factor productivity growth and urbanization economies : A case of Indian industries. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 12(2), 97-108.
Neogi, C., Kamiike, A., & Sato, T. (2012). Identification of factors behind the performance of pharmaceutical industries in India (RIEB, Kobe University Discussion Paper Series DP 2012-23). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6527/e40f5867bb28fcbf1e425e7ec7e29bf7af50.pdf
State of the Economy 2015 : Shrouded in mist. (2015, March 31). Outlook Business. Retrieved from https://www.outlookbusiness.com/specials/state-of-the-economy_2015/shrouded-in-mist-659
Panda, P., & Mishra, S. (2018). Highways and growth: A causal analysis for India. Arthashastra Indian Journal of Economics and Research, 7(4), 19-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/aijer/2018/v7i4/131654
Scott, A. J. (1986). Industrial organization and location : Division of labour, the firm, and spatial process. Economic Geography, 62 (3), 215-231.
