Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 977

A Comparative Study of Leadership Factors Affecting Public and Private Sector Banks in India: An Employee Perspective

Affiliations

  • Assistant Professor (Quantitative and Research Methods), National Institute of Construction Management and Research, 25/1, Balewadi, NIA Post Office, Pune-411 045, India
  • Assistant Professor (Business Communication), Gandhi Institute for Education & Technology, Baniatangi, PO: Bajapur, Khurda - 752 060, Odisha, India

Abstract


In the scenario of cutthroat competition and changing business models, employee motivation is the key driver of organizational effectiveness. Among many factors that impact employee motivation, leadership is one of them, not only at the top level, but at every stage of functioning. The study highlights the underlying dimensions of employee- perceived leadership in Indian banking sectors as well as compares and contrasts the leadership perceptions between the public and private sector banks. The data was collected through a structured questionnaire from both the public and private sector bank employees and was analyzed by using SPSS to make it informative. The results reveal that employees of public sector banks perceived their leaders as Rule-based-task-oriented and Committed-withcentralized-authority, whereas employees of private sector banks perceived their leaders as Integrated-higher-task-performing and Rule-based-submissive-authoritarian. It was also found that the employees of public sector banks perceived their leaders as more Nurturing, Autocratic, and Bureaucratic, whereas the employees of private sector banks perceived their leaders to be more Task-Oriented and Participative by nature.


Keywords

Leadership, Employee Perception, Banking Sector, Private Sector Banks, Public Sector Banks

D23, J24, L2, M12

Paper Submission Date : June 12, 2012 ; Paper sent back for Revision : July 7, 2013 ; Paper Acceptance Date : July 19, 2013.


Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 6)

References


  • Bris, A. (2010, May). The Lehman Brothers case: A corporate governance failure, not a failure of Financial markets. Retrieved from http://www.imd.org/research/challenges/TC039-10.cfm
  • Boseman, G., (2008). Effective leadership in a changing world. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 62 (3), 36-38.
  • Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership (pp. 1-3). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Deloitte (2012). India banking fraud survey 2012: Navigating the challenging environment. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-India/Local%20Assets/Documents/Thoughtware/India_Banking_Fraud_Survey_2012.pdf
  • Doshi, V., Sinha, J., Moda, G., & Nahar, A. (2012). Taking the leadership leap : Developing an effective executive pipeline for India's future. India : Booz & Co. Retrieved from http://www.booz.com/media/file/BoozCo_Taking-the-Leadership-Leap.pdf
  • Earley, P. C. & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures (pp. 63-65). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Gardner, J. W. (1965). Self-Renewal: The individual and the innovative society (pp. 29-32). New York : Harper & Row.
  • Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ (pp. 201-207). New York: Bantam Books.
  • Handy, C. (1976). Understanding organizations (pp. 181-185). New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Harrison, R. (1972). Understanding your organization's character. Harvard Business Review, 50 (3), 119-182.
  • Hay Group (2012). Coercive style of leadership threatens to erode innovation in Indian workplace [news release]. Retrieved from http://www.haygroup.com/downloads/in/Leadership%20styles%20press%20release%20final.pdf
  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2003). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • KPMG. (2012). Indian Banks: Performance benchmarking report FY12 Results. India : KPMG International. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.de/docs/Performance-benchmarking-report-FY-2012.pdf
  • Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G., & Wright, P. (1992). A competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: Toward a conceptual integration. Journal of Management, 18 (1), 77-91. DOI:10.1177/014920639201800106
  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. & White, R.K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (1), 271-299.
  • Macdonald, L. G., & Robinson, P. (2009). A colossal failure of common sense: The inside story of the collapse of Lehman Brothers (pp. 92-95). New York: Three Rivers Press.
  • Manktelow, J. (2012). Leadership style: Choosing the right style for the situation. Retrieved from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.htm
  • Muralidharan, C., Venkatram, R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2013). Impact of job satisfaction on intention to quit: A study on customer service providers in commercial banks. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 6 (7), 15-25.
  • Nafei, W. A., Khanfar, N. M., & Kaifi, B. A. (2012). Leadership styles and organizational learning an empirical study on Saudi banks in Al-Taif Governorate Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3 (1), 2-17.
  • Nilekani, N. (2009). Imagining India: The idea of renewed nation (pp. 36-39). New York: Penguin Press.
  • Schultz, D. P. (1982). Psychology and industry today. New York: Macmillan.
  • Walumbwa, F. O. , Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L. , Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J., (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34 (1), 89-126. DOI: 10.1177/0149206307308913

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.